|
Post by gillianren on May 26, 2010 3:29:55 GMT -4
Alas, it may well end up being the last question he ever answers. One of the defining characteristics of HBs is not doing any research outside of hoax sites.
|
|
|
Post by Apollo Gnomon on May 27, 2010 20:49:51 GMT -4
The OP thread dropped off the first page at Delusional Idiots today. I'm not resurrecting it.
|
|
|
Post by tedward on May 28, 2010 6:57:26 GMT -4
I have been reading it, hats off to you for sticking in there.
|
|
|
Post by capricorn1 on Jun 15, 2010 11:51:11 GMT -4
www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=120799Been lurking there and saw this.....The premise of why the astronaut appears to go up slowly as well as come down is interesting. And the premise of slow motion, isn't this back to that 'yes and we've done the necessary calculation' David percy malarky?
|
|
|
Post by Apollo Gnomon on Jul 7, 2010 22:21:46 GMT -4
It could be fun if lots of us joined the thread on the David Icke forum if just to burst a few bubbles lol. A user at DIF has read this post and taken it to mean that ApolloHoax readers conspired to join the forum just to disrupt it, which is a violation of the terms-of-service. I have posted the following apology. www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119328&page=148
|
|
|
Post by fireballxl5 on Jul 8, 2010 3:53:25 GMT -4
burst (one's) bubble verb
to disappoint.
I cant see how this person thinks "bust some bubbles" means disrupt, flame, troll etc, it dosent and he knows it. Hes just pulling you're chain because he cant back up his claims. I meant burst some bubbles as in to prove them wrong.
From what i can see on there if you dont agree the landings were a hoax they just call you names like government shill, its their way of not having to respond to things they have no answers to.
Maybe Graflok thinks that everyone on the forum should agree with him or they are out to disrupt.
|
|
|
Post by ineluki on Jul 8, 2010 5:11:31 GMT -4
I cant see how this person thinks "bust some bubbles" means disrupt, flame, troll etc, That's because you still think like a sane person, which is clearly not helpful when trying to understand the Ickers.
|
|
|
Post by randombloke on Jul 8, 2010 6:47:03 GMT -4
You really have to remember that the DIF were founded by a man who, after failing out of a professional football career, became convinced that he was literally the son of god. Oh and also that the British royal family are in fact humanoid lizards in disguise. Humanoid lizards from space.
I mean, aside from all the theological arguments against this "son of god" thing and the innumerable reproductive issues surrounding lizard-human hybrids (of which at least some of them must be), it is quite clear that his rational thought processes, supposing of course that they ever existed in the first place, have been entirely supplanted by misremembered bits of the script from V: the miniseries.
|
|
|
Post by Apollo Gnomon on Jul 8, 2010 11:15:18 GMT -4
Ya know what warms my heart, though?
Watching Ultima1 and davidC/rocky/cosmored trollfight.
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Jul 8, 2010 15:05:38 GMT -4
I don't think I could handle that forum.
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Jul 8, 2010 15:39:18 GMT -4
It is certainly a mess over there...
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Jul 8, 2010 16:24:53 GMT -4
So let me get this straight - a few members here "ganged up" on the hundreds or thousands in the David Icke forum?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Gorsky on Jul 8, 2010 17:10:55 GMT -4
You really have to remember that the DIF were founded by a man who, after failing out of a professional football career ... David Icke may be many things ... most of them head-scratchingly off this planet ... but he certainly didn't "fail out of a professional football career". Sure, he was never going to threaten Shilton's place in the England team, but he was building himself a respectable professional career when arthritis forced him to give up the game at the age of 21. He was also a very good, highly professional and well respected sports journalist and broadcaster before his ... erm ... revelation. The fact that he is spreading all kinds of bizarre and outlandish teachings now doesn't give us the right to re-write his entire life history and write it off as one long story of failure. It only makes it more sad, for me, that one of my favourite sportscasters as I was growing up has become so wrapped up in this stuff.
|
|
|
Post by capricorn1 on Jul 10, 2010 13:58:48 GMT -4
The HB pinnacle of research on that site seems to be all about the Apollo 15 flag moving!
What is the concensus on it? To me it just looks like he brushed it with his arm.....Then Jarrah White has his argument about this slight movement before he arrives?
|
|
|
Post by gwiz on Jul 10, 2010 15:06:45 GMT -4
The HB pinnacle of research on that site seems to be all about the Apollo 15 flag moving! What is the concensus on it? To me it just looks like he brushed it with his arm.....Then Jarrah White has his argument about this slight movement before he arrives? The consensus is that there isn't enough evidence in the video to say for certain what caused the movement out of a number of possibilities. These include the possibility you mention, static electricity, dirt kicked up by an astronaut against the flag and the flagpole settling due to either dirt again or vibrations through the ground from the astronauts movements. What is certain is that the idea that it takes place in an atmosphere is ruled out by the long time that it takes the movement to damp down again.
|
|