ApolloHoax.net

ApolloHoax.net
« HB Contradictions »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 25, 2013, 12:06am




ApolloHoax.net :: The Apollo Hoax :: The Hoax Theory :: HB Contradictions
« Page 28 of 33 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: HB Contradictions (Read 31,587 times)
dragonblaster
Earth
member is offline

[avatar]

Proud to be called a loony by HBs

[msn]

Joined: Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 222
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #405 on Sept 6, 2009, 4:18pm »


Aug 30, 2009, 7:33pm, ka9q wrote:
It's the only conceivable obstacle to human lunar flight that would not also block robotic missions.


So why didn't they just say the command module was covered in a layer of unobtanium, or even that it had lead lining - a few extra tons here and there could have been covered by a small exaggeration in Saturn V's lift capability. Why did NASA post diagrams of the CM skin composition if cursory examination would have shown it unequal to the task?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Only an ex-psychiatric patient has a certificate to say he's sane
ka9q
Saturn
member is offline





Joined: Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,292
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #406 on Sept 7, 2009, 3:42pm »


Sept 6, 2009, 4:18pm, dragonblaster wrote:
So why didn't they just say the command module was covered in a layer of unobtanium, or even that it had lead lining - a few extra tons here and there could have been covered by a small exaggeration in Saturn V's lift capability. Why did NASA post diagrams of the CM skin composition if cursory examination would have shown it unequal to the task?


Because "whistleblowers" had to make NASA slip up in ways that only the clever HBs could eventually detect, naturally. These mistakes are far too subtle for mere mortals like conventionally trained engineers and scientists to detect, you understand. Even when an "obvious anomaly" is pointed out to us, we still refuse to see it. Obviously we Apollogists are deep into denial... :)
« Last Edit: Sept 7, 2009, 3:43pm by ka9q »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
raven
Jupiter
member is offline

[avatar]

That ain't Earth, kiddies.



Joined: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 509
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #407 on Dec 6, 2009, 6:17pm »

This wasnt a contradiction, but it breaks my brain nonetheless. Not five minutes ago, an CT claimed that, in 1969, they thought 2,500. My brain, my poor, innocent, brain.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Conspiracy Theorist Mindset: "It's Turtles All The Way Down. Government Turtles. "
homobibiens
Guest
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #408 on Dec 6, 2009, 6:44pm »


Dec 6, 2009, 6:17pm, raven wrote:
This wasnt a contradiction, but it breaks my brain nonetheless. Not five minutes ago, an CT claimed that, in 1969, they thought 2,500. My brain, my poor, innocent, brain.


They thought 2,500 what?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
slang
Venus
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 93
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #409 on Dec 6, 2009, 7:43pm »


Dec 6, 2009, 6:44pm, homobibiens wrote:
They thought 2,500 what?


Exactly. Lethal poison for the poor, innocent, brain.

Another contradiction, as noted by Laurel on BAUT:

Ed White was supposedly killed for not wanting to be part of any moonlanding hoax, but apparently he didn't mind at all faking his Gemini 4 first American space walk.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
homobibiens
Guest
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #410 on Dec 6, 2009, 10:41pm »


Dec 6, 2009, 7:43pm, slang wrote:

Dec 6, 2009, 6:44pm, homobibiens wrote:
They thought 2,500 what?


Exactly. Lethal poison for the poor, innocent, brain.


I am still completely in the dark as to what "They thought 2,500" means here.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
raven
Jupiter
member is offline

[avatar]

That ain't Earth, kiddies.



Joined: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 509
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #411 on Dec 7, 2009, 4:26am »

Oh gods I am sorry. I must have hit reply without thinking. Brace yourselves.
The creature in questions thinks that they thought the moon was 2,500 miles away in 1969.
Sorry, the idiocracy if the comment must have been infectious.
To quote noble Homer, "D'oh!"
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Conspiracy Theorist Mindset: "It's Turtles All The Way Down. Government Turtles. "
homobibiens
Guest
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #412 on Dec 7, 2009, 4:33am »

OK, now I understand the nature of the gross injustice committed against your poor innocent brain :)

While I find it entirely believable that there were people in 1969 who thought the Apollo launch site in Florida was closer to the moon than it was to Paris, I seriously doubt any of those people worked for NASA or any of the contracting agencies. Well, not in any important position, at least. Maybe one of the people who took out the trash at NASA believed the moon was 2,500 miles away, that is possible, but I don't think anyone planning the mission, designing/building any of the equipment, etc. would have thought this.
« Last Edit: Dec 7, 2009, 4:35am by homobibiens »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Kiwi


member is offline





Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,064
Location: New Zealand
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #413 on Dec 8, 2009, 7:19am »


Dec 7, 2009, 4:26am, raven wrote:
The creature in questions thinks that they thought the moon was 2,500 miles away in 1969.


If you can, ask him to quote his source, and feel free to mention the following:

The moon's distance, 1950:
Pears Cyclopaedia, Sixtieth Edition; Editor L. Mary Barker, B.Sc. (Lond.); A. & F. Pears Ltd, Isleworth, Middlesex, England; Autumn 1950; page 612:
Moon, the earth's satellite, is distant from us 238,857 miles. It is a globe 2,160 miles in diameter...

And further back, 1926:
Webster's New International Dictionary; Editor In Chief, W. T. Harris, PH.D., LL.D.; G. & C. Merriam Company, Springfield, Mass., USA; 1926; page 1403:
The moon's diameter is 2,162 miles; mean distance from the earth, about 238,840 miles; mass, about one eightieth that of the earth, and volume, about one forty-ninth.

Those are two books I have at home. Further research would likely show that the moon's distance from earth was fairly accurately known many years before they were published.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Don't criticize what you can't understand. — Bob Dylan, “The Times They Are A-Changin'” (1963)
Some people think they are thinking when they are really rearranging their prejudices and superstitions. — Edward R. Murrow (1908–65)
gwiz


member is offline





Joined: Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,682
Location: Cornwall
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #414 on Dec 8, 2009, 11:26am »


Dec 8, 2009, 7:19am, Kiwi wrote:
Further research would likely show that the moon's distance from earth was fairly accurately known many years before they were published.

The earliest book in my collection is The Heavens by Amedee Guillemin, Richard Bentley & Son, London, 1883. On p115 we have "According to the latest researches of Professor Adams, the mean distance of the centres of the Earth and the Moon is 238,793 miles"
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind - Terry Pratchett
...the ascent module ... took off like a rocket - Moon Man
raven
Jupiter
member is offline

[avatar]

That ain't Earth, kiddies.



Joined: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 509
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #415 on Dec 8, 2009, 6:09pm »

I provided a link showing that the Ancient GREEKS could and did figure out a very good approximation using eclipses. And yes, I asked repeatedly for sources for their claim. The closest I got to a response was "Library books".
Ouch, ouch, ouch. :P
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Conspiracy Theorist Mindset: "It's Turtles All The Way Down. Government Turtles. "
Ginnie


member is offline

[avatar]


[homepage]

Joined: Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,820
Location: Ontario, Canada
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #416 on Dec 8, 2009, 7:10pm »


Dec 8, 2009, 7:19am, Kiwi wrote:

Dec 7, 2009, 4:26am, raven wrote:
The creature in questions thinks that they thought the moon was 2,500 miles away in 1969.


If you can, ask him to quote his source, and feel free to mention the following:

The moon's distance, 1950:
Pears Cyclopaedia, Sixtieth Edition; Editor L. Mary Barker, B.Sc. (Lond.); A. & F. Pears Ltd, Isleworth, Middlesex, England; Autumn 1950; page 612:
Moon, the earth's satellite, is distant from us 238,857 miles. It is a globe 2,160 miles in diameter...

And further back, 1926:
Webster's New International Dictionary; Editor In Chief, W. T. Harris, PH.D., LL.D.; G. & C. Merriam Company, Springfield, Mass., USA; 1926; page 1403:
The moon's diameter is 2,162 miles; mean distance from the earth, about 238,840 miles; mass, about one eightieth that of the earth, and volume, about one forty-ninth.

Those are two books I have at home. Further research would likely show that the moon's distance from earth was fairly accurately known many years before they were published.

The distance from the center of the earth to the center of the moon is about 239,000 miles...
from "The Moon: A Popular Treatise" by Garvett P. Serviss (1907)
http://www.archive.org/stream/moonpopulartreat00servuoft#page/n7/mode/2up
« Last Edit: Dec 8, 2009, 7:11pm by Ginnie »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Moonman: "I also challenge NASA to flight around the moon on any of their next shuttle missions. They don't need to land on it, just fly around it."
randombloke
Mars
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 287
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #417 on Dec 8, 2009, 8:13pm »

OK, so we have four pre-Apollo sources, three of which are pre-rocketry in general. A quick analysis shows that even the earliest was within half of a percentage point of the current mean orbital distance as given by Wolfram|Alpha:

238793 (1883)
239000 (1907)
238840 (1926)
238857 (1950)

239200 (current average from W|A)
238004 (current average -0.5%)

Somewhat surprisingly though, the 1907 figure is closest. Does anyone have any more authoritative sources for the lunar orbital distance?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Every minute you're not looking directly at Batman is a minute he is potentially spying on you.
frenat


member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 655
Location: Tyndall AFB, FL
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #418 on Dec 8, 2009, 11:39pm »

Maybe they saw it in scientific notation and didn't understand it?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
randombloke
Mars
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 287
 Re: HB Contradictions
« Reply #419 on Dec 9, 2009, 10:12am »

How do you get "2500" from "2.39x10^5" though?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Every minute you're not looking directly at Batman is a minute he is potentially spying on you.
« Page 28 of 33 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

We have moved!

Join us at http://www.apollohoax.net/forum today!
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile