Re: The Smoking Gun of Bart's "Smoking Gun" Footag « Reply #468 on Jul 24, 2009, 10:15am »
Unfortunately, you are correct... the "BS" still continues three years later
And, for your information... I didn't actually see when the original post was made until now. As I said, I am new to the site. Is this how you welcome new folks?
« Last Edit: Jul 24, 2009, 10:17am by friptronic »
Unfortunately, you are correct... the "BS" still continues three years later
And, for your information... I didn't actually see when the original post was made until now. As I said, I am new to the site. Is this how you welcome new folks?
Oversensitive, much?
I don't see anything here that should garner the reaction that you gave to it ... his point, surely, was that three years on from Count's work nothing has changed in the way "BS" goes about his business peddling moon hoax videos.
Surely a dig at him, rather than a dig at you for responding to a three year old thread which has been posted in pretty regularly over that time.
Joined: Jul 2007 Gender: Male Posts: 131 Location: Aylesbury
Re: The Smoking Gun of Bart's "Smoking Gun" Footag « Reply #471 on Sept 30, 2009, 7:06pm »
We need to appreciate that some people are new to this and look at the historic posts and comment in real time. They may not be "bathed" in the world of misdirection, fiction and non scientific nonsense that flies in the face of the facts.
We all know it as HBs and the continuing BS they spout.
The problem is that most of these guys ignore anything that refutes their claims as they are all "truth seekers" who believe that "their truth" irrelevant of whether its based on any fact
Even though over the last 10-20 year 100% of HBs claims have been placed in the bin of nonsense by scientists and people who have a concept of science and reality, these people regurgitate the same stuff again and again.
Re: The Smoking Gun of Bart's "Smoking Gun" Footag « Reply #473 on Nov 26, 2009, 2:54pm »
My first post MUST be used to congratulate Count Zero on his excellent work. It is nice to finally find somebody prepared to examine the evidence closely instead of repeating somebody elses findings - cheers....now where is the thread on apollo 20 i joined this forum for....?
My first post MUST be used to congratulate Count Zero on his excellent work. It is nice to finally find somebody prepared to examine the evidence closely instead of repeating somebody elses findings - cheers....now where is the thread on apollo 20 i joined this forum for....?
"My feet they finally took root in the Earth, but I got me a nice little place in the stars, and I swear I found the key to the universe in the engine of an old parked car..."
My first post MUST be used to congratulate Count Zero on his excellent work. It is nice to finally find somebody prepared to examine the evidence closely instead of repeating somebody elses findings - cheers....now where is the thread on apollo 20 i joined this forum for....?
Thank you and welcome. Be sure to check out this thread in the "Reality of Apollo" section. My personal favorite is Data Cable's epic pwning of "showtime" concerning Venus. Enjoy!
Sibrel believes that the technology of the United States during the era was behind that of the Soviets. He points to a supposed "five-to-one superiority" in man-hours in space held by the Soviets over the US as well as highlighting several Soviet space firsts.[6] The "five-to-one" figure has been strongly challenged, with the Clavius website, a website dedicated to the debunking of the Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations stating that the Americans had a clear lead in man hours in space by the time Apollo 11 was launched.[7]
LOL....thats what this idiot really believes or he's just saying this to make a buck in his stupid movies?
He thinks Voskod was more advanced than all the things Gemini did? And that two Voskod missions gave them a 5-1 advantage over 12 flown Gemini missions. Surely to goodness he's not really that stupid and is just trying to make a buck with his movies is my guess.
Comparison with Gemini After the first-generation spacecraft Vostok and Mercury had proved the technical feasibility of manned spaceflight, NASA proceeded to build its second-generation capsule, Gemini, which was a completely new design which retained the successful features of Mercury, like the conical shape with a heat shield at the bottom.
But several new features were added to Gemini, for example engines strong enough to significantly alter orbit, docking and rendezvous facilities, and provisions for EVA, all of which were essential for practical applications of spaceflight, namely a manned Moon mission.
In comparison to that, Voskhod capsules were simply modified Vostok craft, retaining most of Vostok's limitations. In the end, Voskhod turned out to be a dead end and was abandoned after only two manned missions, to be superseded by the much more capable Soyuz.
LOL....thats what this idiot really believes or he's just saying this to make a buck in his stupid movies?
He thinks Voskod was more advanced than all the things Gemini did? And that two Voskod missions gave them a 5-1 advantage over 12 flown Gemini missions. Surely to goodness he's not really that stupid and is just trying to make a buck with his movies is my guess.
Jason Thompson, a well-respected member of this forum, had an e-mail exchange with Sibrel a few years ago and explained to him exactly why his 5-1 Russian superiority claim was wrong. The fact that Sibrel is still making this claim would seem to indicate that yes, he is just trying to make money and doesn't care about accuracy or truth. See this thread for details. http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cg....play&thread=650
"My feet they finally took root in the Earth, but I got me a nice little place in the stars, and I swear I found the key to the universe in the engine of an old parked car..."
The fact that Sibrel is still making this claim would seem to indicate that yes, he is just trying to make money and doesn't care about accuracy or truth.
You just might be right, considering that Sibrel also enjoys jumping up and down on cars.
The fact that Sibrel is still making this claim would seem to indicate that yes, he is just trying to make money and doesn't care about accuracy or truth.
You just might be right, considering that Sibrel also enjoys jumping up and down on cars.
Well, he has to get the money to pay his fines and court costs somehow.