ApolloHoax.net - A question for Jay Windley

ApolloHoax.net
« A question for Jay Windley »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 8, 2010, 8:11pm

ApolloHoax.net :: Off Topic :: Other Conspiracy Theories :: A question for Jay Windley

Author

Topic: A question for Jay Windley (Read 1,889 times)

rocky
Earth
BANNED
member is offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 212

A question for Jay Windley
« Thread Started on Aug 13, 2007, 9:49am »

Jay, you are a scientist so I want your opinion as a scientist of what the scientist in this video says.

GLOBAL NUCLEAR COVER UP part #1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3626298989248030643

GLOBAL NUCLEAR COVER UP part #2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7451332617120640846

Is she credible? Should we take her seriously?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

captainswoop
Earth
member is offline

Joined: Nov 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 136

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #1 on Aug 13, 2007, 10:03am »

part one lasts an hour, why can't u give us a round up of it?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

LunarOrbit
Administrator

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 2,392
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #2 on Aug 13, 2007, 10:09am »

why can't u give us a round up of it?

He can't because he is incapable of making an argument in his own words, he is completely dependent on others to do his thinking for him.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

JayUtah

member is offline

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 4,444

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #3 on Aug 13, 2007, 11:06am »

Jay, you are a scientist so I want your opinion as a scientist...

No, you want to try to discredit me by whatever answer I give, or by my refusal to give an answer. Since the outcome will not change no matter what I do, I choose not to participate.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

rocky
Earth
BANNED
member is offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 212

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #4 on Aug 13, 2007, 12:56pm »

Quote:

Jay, you are a scientist so I want your opinion as a scientist...

No, you want to try to discredit me by whatever answer I give, or by my refusal to give an answer. Since the outcome will not change no matter what I do, I choose not to participate.

Jay, you're making an honest man out of the person who started this thread.
http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/index.....77113447&page=1

Quote:

There is also your behaviour on the moon forums which is like some nasty little ghetto kid spitting at anyone who comes near him. Basically a complete mental spastic with an academic background. The apollohoax forum is a cesspit populated by the ugliest 'human beings' on planet earth.

Adding up your qualifications and behaviour, the solution was 'spook'. In other words, you must be employed by some US government agency as an academic spy before the Apollo hoax became mainstream) and were co-opted after the Fox TV programme.. It simply isn't believable that anyone with that background would try and pass of such nonsense as truth particularly as the site is obviously an outlet for industry (including NASA) insiders.

Jay, if you give a sincere answer, how is that going to discredit you? An objective truth-seeking scientist would answer any science-related question asked of him.

Jay, it has been alleged that you're a government plant who knows good and well that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I'm not in a position to verify anything but you are certainly behaving like one as a government plant has to go along with the official version of everything. You seem to be afraid of what this scientist says. Is it because you know it's true but you can't go against it? Is it so obviously true that if you go against what she says, you'll just look silly? Are you caught between a rock and a hard place? Your credibility is on the line here and the credibility of this whole site is on the line. How are we supposed to take anything you say about Apollo seriously if you are afraid to address other science-related issues that are of great importance. The scientist in that video is making some serious accusations. It's hard to believe that a scientist and university professor doesn't have an opinion on what she alleges.
You are not behaving like an objective truth-seeking scientist here to say the least.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

frenat

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 537
Location: Robins AFB, GA

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #5 on Aug 13, 2007, 1:09pm »

How is this related to Apollo? Oh that's right. It isn't. If Jay chooses to only answer about Apollo then that is fine. This issue is completely unrelated and proves nothing but the fact that you are trying stupid tricks that would get you laughed out of any debate the same as everyone is laughing at you here.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

BertL

member is offline

[avatar]

Woah, is that thing... pulsing?

Joined: Nov 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 1,260
Location: the Netherlands

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #6 on Aug 13, 2007, 1:14pm »

Quote:

An objective truth-seeking scientist would answer any science-related question asked of him.

How so?

Also, LunarOrbit gave you a second warning here. Give answer to it, or get yourself banned. To show why your logic I quoted just three lines up is faulty: Anyone who wouldn't want to get himself banned would retract that claim.

Therefore, if you don't retract it, you show that you want to get banned.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Spread the Love!

JayUtah

member is offline

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 4,444

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #7 on Aug 13, 2007, 1:42pm »

Jay, it has been alleged that you're a government plant who knows good and well that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I'm not in a position to verify anything...

You accuse me of lying yet you admit you have no evidence. Withdraw the accusation immediately or substantiate it immediately. I will not submit to your loaded litmus tests and I will most certainly not suffer being called a liar with no evidence.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

scooter

member is offline

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 989

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #8 on Aug 13, 2007, 1:55pm »

He just wants to get banned, that's very clear. No retractions, no apologies, just loads up and blazes away like nothing happened....
He needs help...I'm amazed at his belief in these "agents"...(cue spooky music...)

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

BertL

member is offline

[avatar]

Woah, is that thing... pulsing?

Joined: Nov 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 1,260
Location: the Netherlands

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #9 on Aug 13, 2007, 2:11pm »

Yep, he wants to get banned.

I even sent him a PM linking to LunarOrbit's warning. He has read it, however no response at all.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Spread the Love!

Jason Thompson

member is offline

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 1,184
Location: South East England

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #10 on Aug 13, 2007, 5:44pm »

Right, well let's start a coutndown to the moment of rocky's inevitable, much sought after banning then....

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.

PhantomWolf

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 4,009
Location: Lost Deimos Moonbase

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #11 on Aug 13, 2007, 5:49pm »

Quote:

Right, well let's start a coutndown to the moment of rocky's inevitable, much sought after banning then....

You're a little late on that count.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah

"On two occasions, I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)

LunarOrbit
Administrator

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 2,392
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: A question for Jay Windley
« Reply #12 on Aug 13, 2007, 9:10pm »

Yeah, sorry, I banned him at around 4pm ET, but I was running late for work so I didn't have time to post an announcement about it.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP: