ApolloHoax.net

ApolloHoax.net
« Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed! »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 23, 2013, 4:42pm




ApolloHoax.net :: The Apollo Hoax :: The Hoax Theory :: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed!
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed! (Read 2,511 times)
djw001
Mercury
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 5
 Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed!
« Thread Started on Nov 5, 2011, 7:35pm »

Hoax believers have taken the urban legend that the LM mock-up in the London Science Museum was built at Pinewood Studios for "Diamonds Are Forever" to a new level. They are keeping the bit about it being made at Pinewood, but they are now claiming that it was built for Stanley Kubrick's Apollo "film." Since the LM in the Kensington museum is obviously not functional, it "proves" that the landings were fake. I investigated this urban legend by contacting the museum. Here is their reply:

"Thank you for your email dated 26th October 2011 with regards to the possibility that the Science Museum’s model Apollo 11 Lunar Lander is (or was) a prop from a film – possibly Diamonds Are Forever or Apollo 13. The object is inventoried within the Museum’s collections as follows:

Replica Apollo 11 lunar excursion module (Inventory number 1977-435)

This object is currently on display within the Museum’s Exploring Space Gallery; should you wish to view it please visit the Museum during normal opening hours – 10am to 6pm, last entry 5.15pm, Monday to Sunday except 24th to 26th December. I have reviewed the Museum’s technical file linked to this, T/1977-435, and there is no mention of this object being used (or potentially used) in any filming production prior to entering the Museum’s care.

The object formerly entered the Museum’s care in 1977. In fact original correspondence (held on nominal file 6954) with the original model makers, Westbury Design and Optical Ltd, indicates that this object was built specifically at the request of the Museum and for display purposes only. Further more the original enquiry into obtaining a quote from the above model making company was made by the Museum in 1975. Diamonds Are Forever was released in 1971 and Apollo 13 in 1995. As you can see the Museum’s model post-dates these films by several years.

Museum paperwork also contains original drawings supplied by NASA and Grumman Aerospace (the company who built the original Apollo Lunar Landers). With further correspondence suggesting the Museum liaised with these institutions to supply Westbury Design and Optical Ltd the most detailed and authentic plans as possible. I trust this information is of some use to you and I wish you all the best with your research.
Rory Cook
Corporate Information and Enquiries Officer
Science Museum"

Please be sure to spread this information as widely as possible!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
gillianren


member is offline

[avatar]

[msn]
[homepage]

Joined: Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,492
Location: Olympia
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #1 on Nov 5, 2011, 7:40pm »

What would they say about the real Apollo capsule which is on display in the science museum in Los Angeles? (Yes, I got a picture!)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Gillian

"This seems like a job for Bipolar Bear . . . but I just can't seem to get out of bed."

"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." --Mark Twain
Obviousman


member is offline

[avatar]

Spaced out & plane crazy



Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 987
Location: Australia!
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #2 on Nov 6, 2011, 5:55am »

Good to see some research instead of just accepting things as you are told, djw001 - well done! I particularly like that they have provided - and you have posted - the file numbers associated with the origin.

Don't forget to have the reply scanned.
« Last Edit: Nov 6, 2011, 5:57am by Obviousman »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"Truth needs no defence. Nobody - NOBODY - can ever take the footsteps I made on the surface of the Moon away from me."
Gene Cernan, Apollo 17
tedward
Saturn
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,011
Location: Wales
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #3 on Nov 6, 2011, 8:18am »

The straw of clutching is plentiful on this topic.

Tried to get a few shots of it when I was there last but it was popular with the kids, got Apollo 10 on film but the model looks slightly different if memory serves me. Of course though, the straw of clutching has caveats for this.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Jason Thompson


member is offline





Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,845
Location: South East England
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #4 on Nov 6, 2011, 11:18am »

The absurdity of that claim is such that it can only be made by someone who has never actually been to the Science Museum and seen it. I have, on several occasions. it is tatty and a bit of a poor replica, frankly. The shape is right but the finish is not, with the ascent stage clearly being made of wood rather than metal. Beyond the superficial resemblance it really does not bear comparison with the LMs seen in the pictures and film of Apollo at all.

I do wonder what they say about the actual Apollo 10 command module that is also there, or the actual spacesuit worn by Bill Anders on Apollo 8....

Nice bit of detective work there, and nice that the museum have actually checked the paperwork rather than just fobbing you off.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Glom


member is offline





Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 254
Location: Denham, England
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #5 on Nov 20, 2011, 5:21pm »

So the existence of mock ups proves that the real articles weren't real.

What version of stupid is this?

But that reminds me. I should probably add the Science Museum to my Day of Checking Things in London.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
gtvc
Venus
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 62
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #6 on Nov 20, 2011, 9:41pm »

I think the guy in charge of the special effects in 2001 is Brian Johnson, Kubrick was the director, Johnson is the creator of the popular Eagle spacecraft of Space:1999 in the movie 2001 he made the moon ships and the moonbase, he worked at Pinewood Studios and he never said anything about a moon hoax, he gives interviews but most of the people ask him about his popular ship and Tv show. Kubrick never did any special effects in the moon in the movie 2001 he was the supervisor, Johnson was in charge but he didn´t get any credit for this http://www.space1999.net/catacombs/main/crguide/vcs.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Johnson_(special_effects)
« Last Edit: Nov 20, 2011, 9:44pm by gtvc »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
chrlz
Earth
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 119
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #7 on Nov 21, 2011, 8:33am »


Nov 20, 2011, 9:41pm, gtvc wrote:
I think the guy in charge of the special effects in 2001 is Brian Johnson, Kubrick was the director, Johnson is the creator of the popular Eagle spacecraft of Space:1999 in the movie 2001 he made the moon ships and the moonbase, he worked at Pinewood Studios and he never said anything about a moon hoax, he gives interviews but most of the people ask him about his popular ship and Tv show. Kubrick never did any special effects in the moon in the movie 2001 he was the supervisor, Johnson was in charge but he didn´t get any credit for this http://www.space1999.net/catacombs/main/crguide/vcs.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Johnson_(special_effects)


Going a bit offtopic, but what made you think that Johnson was in charge of the effects in 2001? As far as I always understood, Douglas Trumbull* was the effects supervisor. The only references to Johnson I can find relate to some work he did on the lunar base scenes.. As a 2001 fanboi, I'd be interested to know more, if you have conflicting info...

OK, back to your normal programming.. :P

* also known for Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Star Trek: The Motion Picture, Blade Runner, Silent Running and Brainstorm (not a bad resume..)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
gtvc
Venus
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 62
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #8 on Nov 21, 2011, 11:04am »

Well I know Brian was in charge of the moon ships in 2001 thats the reason he was later in space 1999, if Stanley really wanted to do a " moon hoax" he would use the same people of 2001 no? specially the guy in charge of the moon special effects ;D maybe Im wrong :P
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
dwight


member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,120
Location: Olde Yurope
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #9 on Nov 21, 2011, 11:27am »

Trumbull was definitely the head of effects on 2001, using such techniques as slit-scan photography and very very rudimentary motion control. John Dykstra worked with him on Silent Runnings. And none of these guys were involved in any type of hoax for Apollo.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"they have more than a problem..." flight loop Apollo 13
RAF


member is offline





Joined: May 2005
Posts: 337
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #10 on Nov 21, 2011, 5:04pm »


Nov 5, 2011, 7:40pm, gillianren wrote:
What would they say about the real Apollo capsule which is on display in the science museum in Los Angeles? (Yes, I got a picture!)


Speaking of which, here's a picture of the Apollo 9 CM as it is displayed at the San Diego Aerospace Museum....with some weirdo guy. :)


Please login to download attachments.
« Last Edit: Nov 21, 2011, 5:05pm by RAF »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Glom


member is offline





Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 254
Location: Denham, England
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #11 on Nov 21, 2011, 6:01pm »

Oh yeah? Well how about Kitty Hawk?




Please login to download attachments.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
tedward
Saturn
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,011
Location: Wales
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #12 on Nov 22, 2011, 5:09am »

Around the corner from the mock is this
click me
1.7mb jpeg (all mine)

Apollo 10.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
redneckr0nin
Venus
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 74
Location: Red Deer Alberta
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #13 on Dec 2, 2011, 7:55pm »


Nov 5, 2011, 7:40pm, gillianren wrote:
What would they say about the real Apollo capsule which is on display in the science museum in Los Angeles? (Yes, I got a picture!)


Please post a picture of that.. I would very much like to see it!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
nightfever
Mercury
member is offline





Joined: Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17
Location: Wyoming
 Re: Lunar Module in London Science Museum: Exposed
« Reply #14 on Jan 4, 2012, 1:55pm »

Regardless, people are going to accept anything that looks like a module because they don't think otherwise
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Where will Foot Foot go
What will Foot Foot do
Oh, Foot Foot
I wish I could find you-The Shaggs
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

We have moved!

Join us at http://www.apollohoax.net/forum today!
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile