9/11, for the heck of it Jul 5, 2005 20:03:35 GMT -4
Post by turbonium on Jul 5, 2005 20:03:35 GMT -4
turbonium said:Squibs 'R' Us....OK here is some photo evidence showing demo charges going off
All I see is dust and debris; certainly nothing that looks like demolition squibs. Besides, the pictures show exactly what I was describing -- the bottom floors are completely intact. This directly contradicts your explanation for how the towers fell so quickly. You said "all support points are blown at millisecond intervals". Clearly this is not true since the bottom part of the towers have not been blown.
I'm still looking for an answer. Let me ask it a different way: If the WTC collapse were a controlled demolition, what about it would make the towers fall any faster than they would if is were a structural failure. And I remind you, your answer must be consistent with and supported by the video evidence.
Let's put it this way, it's easier, and so far I'm the only one putting forth all the links, vids and pics! You watch the videos of the two collapses, try and point out ANY structural resistance that leads to YOUR conclusion that these were ordinary building collapses encountering resistance as they plummeted to the ground.