|
Rex 84
Feb 2, 2006 15:01:38 GMT -4
Post by Dead Hoosiers on Feb 2, 2006 15:01:38 GMT -4
It's been a while since this topic was discussed and the NWO plan to put American citizens in concentration camps has progressed. The government refuses to halt the gigantic influx of illegals entering this country through Mexico either by increasing the border patrol or denying benefits to illegals. Now we're supposed to believe that these new detention centers are for incarcerating illegals? All of a sudden they care? Pull the other one. www.raidersnewsupdate.com/lead-story76.htmSee also www.total411.info, who is also carrying the story this week.
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 2, 2006 19:24:16 GMT -4
Post by PeterB on Feb 2, 2006 19:24:16 GMT -4
Sooo, let's see if I get this right.
The US Govt is planning to lock up American citizens, but is also letting in lots of illegal immigrants.
Why?
To do the jobs of the locked up Americans? So why lock these Americans up in the first place? Is this some giant plot to cut company's salary bills? (Never mind that this would then cut the tax income of the US Govt...) Or does the OAS control the US Govt now?
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 3, 2006 18:19:33 GMT -4
Post by echnaton on Feb 3, 2006 18:19:33 GMT -4
Sooo, let's see if I get this right. The US Govt is planning to lock up American citizens, but is also letting in lots of illegal immigrants. Why? Well somebody has to guard all the citizens in the camps, and illegal immigrants will work for less anyway. We citizens won’t need to work because the government spends more than it takes in so with all of us in camps and not needing government payments, they will actually run a surplus! Or at least that is the best rationale I can make out of it, but perhaps there are a few things unexplained in the scenario.
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 3, 2006 22:28:47 GMT -4
Post by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on Feb 3, 2006 22:28:47 GMT -4
Sooo, let's see if I get this right. The US Govt is planning to lock up American citizens, but is also letting in lots of illegal immigrants. Why? Well somebody has to guard all the citizens in the camps, and illegal immigrants will work for less anyway. We citizens won’t need to work because the government spends more than it takes in so with all of us in camps and not needing government payments, they will actually run a surplus! Or at least that is the best rationale I can make out of it, but perhaps there are a few things unexplained in the scenario. But then nobody would be paying taxes!
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 4, 2006 11:58:55 GMT -4
Post by octoman on Feb 4, 2006 11:58:55 GMT -4
Since rocketdad has vanished, would anybody mind if I take over his "group w" theory? I can't find any rocketdad online that appears to be this one, and I can't find any references to the "theory" he espoused. Seems to me it's fair game, I just want to ask around here first just in case any one might object.
I've read over the statement to DeadHoosiers several times describing "group w" and there's some things in there I would like to follow.
If nobody minds.
I'm sure I can do at least as well with it as stargazer has with the Apollo hoax!
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 4, 2006 22:01:22 GMT -4
Post by ktesibios on Feb 4, 2006 22:01:22 GMT -4
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 5, 2006 8:09:23 GMT -4
Post by Retrograde on Feb 5, 2006 8:09:23 GMT -4
Sorry... I forgot for a moment that I'm talking to a brick wall. Don't argue with them. Exploit them.
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 5, 2006 8:13:42 GMT -4
Post by Retrograde on Feb 5, 2006 8:13:42 GMT -4
The Wikipedia article is a "stub", not to be considered authoritative. Whatever the accuracy or lack thereof of the quoted part, the article concludes: We have independent verification of that part.
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 7, 2006 2:29:10 GMT -4
Post by PhantomWolf on Feb 7, 2006 2:29:10 GMT -4
Yup, those two sites are certainly packed with credibility.
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 9, 2006 3:29:31 GMT -4
Post by Dead Hoosiers on Feb 9, 2006 3:29:31 GMT -4
Since rocketdad has vanished, would anybody mind if I take over his "group w" theory? I can't find any rocketdad online that appears to be this one, and I can't find any references to the "theory" he espoused. Seems to me it's fair game, I just want to ask around here first just in case any one might object. I've read over the statement to DeadHoosiers several times describing "group w" and there's some things in there I would like to follow. If nobody minds. I'm sure I can do at least as well with it as stargazer has with the Apollo hoax! Please go right ahead.
|
|
|
Rex 84
Feb 11, 2006 12:52:59 GMT -4
Post by octoman on Feb 11, 2006 12:52:59 GMT -4
Thanks, DH, I'll keep working on it. There's no "canned" information out there, so I'm having to do all the work myself. Not like many Conspiracy Theorists!
I'm not really politically minded, so I don't have a bunch of relevant bookmarks already lined up. I'm trying to get enough together to hold an intelligent conversation and not just wave my hands. So be patient, please, I'm still getting ready.
|
|
|
Rex 84
May 30, 2007 18:59:32 GMT -4
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 30, 2007 18:59:32 GMT -4
|
|
|
Rex 84
May 30, 2007 23:40:14 GMT -4
Post by gillianren on May 30, 2007 23:40:14 GMT -4
DH, I've asked you this before. Can you provide any objective reason, not referring to the Bible (which, whether you like it or not, has a 2000-year history of transcription errors), as to why we should believe the end of the world is at hand? In fact, do you have any objective evidence of anything?
|
|