lenbrazil
Saturn
Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by lenbrazil on Oct 21, 2005 21:20:37 GMT -4
One of the silliest arguments that 9/11 CTist put forward is the "the hole in the Pentagon is to small" nonsense. On July 28, 1945 a B -25 Mitchell bomber crashed into the 34th Street side if the 79th floor of the Empire State Building. The wingspan of the plane was 68 feet [21 meters] ( www.acepilots.com/planes/b25.html ), I couldn't find specs. for the size of the fuselage but it apears to be about 10 feet x 10 feet[3 x3 meters]. The resulting hole was only 5 x 6 meters [16.5 x 20 feet] ( www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/News/News8-0112.html ) the hole was less than a third of the wingspan but was slightly larger than the size of the fuselage. A 757 has a much wider wingspan than a B-25 124 feet, but it's fuselage is about the same size 12.3 x 13.5 feet. The hole in the Pentagon was about 16 x 20 feet [ www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html ] just about the same size as the hole in the Empire State Building. The abovetopsecret link above offers an excellent debunking of the "no plane hit the Pentagon" BS. Ironiclly ATS is a CT site. For an illustrated version of this post [w/photos] go to the Ed. Forum educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=5221
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Oct 22, 2005 2:10:14 GMT -4
Thanks for the links, they will come in handy.
|
|
|
Post by Obviousman on Oct 22, 2005 6:52:48 GMT -4
I looked up some plans I have for the B-25J, and the fuselage seems to be about 5.5 feet wide by 7 feet tall at it's maximum. Those figures aren't entirely accurate, but they would be within a few inches.
|
|