|
Post by feelfree222 on May 9, 2006 17:30:17 GMT -4
So now you are saying that the terrorists were indeed on the flights, did indeed hijack the planes and crash them into the buildings but they were allowed to do so by TPTB. So why continue with the nonsense of preplanted incendiaries and explosives when crashing 4 aircraft into symbols of American power was already accomplished? (handwaving alert) I never said there was no terrorists in the planes.At least they were used to take all the blame. Even Bin Laden who is a civil engineer was surprised than the WTC's did totally collapsed he expected only a partial collapse. So no handwaving
|
|
|
Post by bazbear on May 10, 2006 1:05:00 GMT -4
So now you are saying that the terrorists were indeed on the flights, did indeed hijack the planes and crash them into the buildings but they were allowed to do so by TPTB. So why continue with the nonsense of preplanted incendiaries and explosives when crashing 4 aircraft into symbols of American power was already accomplished? (handwaving alert) I never said there was no terrorists in the planes.At least they were used to take all the blame. Even Bin Laden who is a civil engineer was surprised than the WTC's did totally collapsed he expected only a partial collapse. So no handwaving A civil engineer is not a stuctural engineer. And I suppose you rang up your buddy Osama and he told you that himself? It's absolutely absurd that you take that supposed quoatation as a fact. Who's to say you're not an Al Queda disinformation agent?
|
|
|
Post by feelfree222 on May 10, 2006 1:37:25 GMT -4
I never said there was no terrorists in the planes.At least they were used to take all the blame. Even Bin Laden who is a civil engineer was surprised than the WTC's did totally collapsed he expected only a partial collapse. So no handwaving A civil engineer is not a stuctural engineer. And I suppose you rang up your buddy Osama and he told you that himself? It's absolutely absurd that you take that supposed quoatation as a fact. Good point that quotation about the expected partial collapse damage limited to ...came from the fake Bin Laden video made by the CIA Edited to add The Fake bin Laden Video Tape comments...www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.htmland analysiswww.npr.org/news/specials/response/investigation/011213.binladen.tape.htmlWho's to say you're not an Al Queda disinformation agent? Osama is not my buddy...nor any other of his Al Queda friends.
|
|
|
Post by twinstead on May 10, 2006 5:37:07 GMT -4
Feelfree222 I get the impression that you pretty much accept anything that you could possibly imagine as evidence of a conspiracy with no questions asked.
Seriously. Whatreallyhappened.com is one of the most biased web sites I have ever seen. Their 'analysis' of the Laden tape is laughable. If you get your news from that site, it is no wonder that you think everything is a conspiracy.
|
|
|
Post by yodaluver28 on May 10, 2006 18:10:29 GMT -4
Why would the CIA make a fake videotaped confession in which a phony Bin Laden openly expresses that he didn't expect hijacked jetliner collisions and their resultant fires to be capable of initiating a global collapse of the towers? Why would the CIA, if behind the whole conspiracy, produce and introduce to the public a tape that casts any doubt over their own cover story?
These "conspirators" must either be diabolical geniuses or total idiots, but they can't possibly be both. Which is it?
|
|
|
Post by feelfree222 on May 10, 2006 18:16:58 GMT -4
If you get your news from that site, it is no wonder that you think everything is a conspiracy. Wrong,I dont think everything is a conspiracy.For example I am not very interested by the Apollo Moon conspiracies. Just to add that my interest for the WTC 911conspiracy came after I drinked too much beers during the Christmas and New Year eve holydays... Hips
|
|
|
Post by feelfree222 on May 10, 2006 18:20:03 GMT -4
Why would the CIA make a fake videotaped confession in which a phony Bin Laden openly expresses that he didn't expect hijacked jetliner collisions and their resultant fires to be capable of initiating a global collapse of the towers? Why would the CIA, if behind the whole conspiracy, produce and introduce to the public a tape that casts any doubt over their own cover story? These "conspirators" must either be diabolical geniuses or total idiots, but they can't possibly be both. Which is it? Can you tell me what does it change that the phony Bin Laden say he expected only a partial collapse ...the thing who matter is the admission of the responsability and that all peoples believe he his the real Bin Laden..,Right?
|
|
|
Post by bazbear on May 11, 2006 0:16:05 GMT -4
Just to add that my interest for the WTC 911conspiracy came after I drinked too much beers during the Christmas and New Year eve holydays... Hips And you still haven't sobered up, is that what you're saying? (to make CTish giant leap to a conclusion based on spurious evidence and logic)
|
|
|
Post by feelfree222 on May 11, 2006 2:59:22 GMT -4
Just to add that my interest for the WTC 911conspiracy came after I drinked too much beers during the Christmas and New Year eve holydays... Hips And you still haven't sobered up, is that what you're saying? (to make CTish giant leap to a conclusion based on spurious evidence and logic) Who will take my participation seriously now? Maybe it is time for me to retire until next winter.
|
|