|
Post by PhantomWolf on Jun 4, 2006 23:08:37 GMT -4
I hope you guys realize that according to most CTs I know, if information doesn't exist on a few select 'objective' web sites, it cannot be considered as evidence against a conspiracy, right?
Not true, it's that if it disagrees with their beliefs then it's government disinformation created by the conspirators. That's the fun of concluding it was a conspriacy prior to looking at the evidence. Anything that points towards and anomoly is automatic proof, regardless of how incorrect it is, because anyone that claims you are wrong in your assertion is a paid governemt agent, and any evidence that counters you was created by the conspirators to fool the sheeple. That way you can ignore anything that might show you as wrong.
|
|