Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Mar 20, 2007 10:58:33 GMT -4
This information is probably only known to the perpetrators, what usually happens is you catch em and ask em and then you go oh I see, you were tricky buggers weren't you. We did catch Khalid Sheik Mohammed, and he has confessed to planning the 9/11 attacks. There you go - real evidence that the official story is correct.
|
|
|
Post by antoniocc on Mar 20, 2007 12:21:58 GMT -4
The problem is that the CTs will probably answer: "He confessed under duress, so it's not valid."
|
|
|
Post by sts60 on Mar 20, 2007 13:25:20 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Mar 20, 2007 15:48:13 GMT -4
And I'd agree with them (he was under duress, as it happens), had he not confessed to quite a lot of that before being captured--and, of course, had we had any prior information on a lot of the stuff he said he'd helped plan, all that stuff that didn't end up happening.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on Mar 20, 2007 19:09:59 GMT -4
Not good enough. If it's so bloody obvious that it couldn't be what actually happened, that it has to have been a conspiracy, you should be able to give more details. Heck, we can give more details than that about conspiracies where the participants are hundreds of years dead and didn't leave written records, even though it, too, is supposition. (Don't believe me? Get me started on the death of Amy Dudley.) The only thing worse in my mind than somebody insisting that I should be seeing something that I honestly don't see and inferring I am either a blind fool or in on the plot because of it, is somebody insisting that so many experts in relevant fields world-wide should be seeing something they honestly don't see and inferring they are either blind fools or in on the plot because of it. Imagine a maternity ward full of babies. The nurse (CT) can smell that one or more of them had a bowel movement but she has to check a whole lot of diapers to determine which one(s). You just claim you can't smell anything. ;D ;D Didn't you just love They Live? Poor Roddy Piper's character had it to do in trying to get his buddy to put on the sunglasses to see what was really going on. For me, being on Apollo Hoax is a lot like being in that movie.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Mar 20, 2007 20:45:00 GMT -4
They Live is an awful movie that is still somehow entertaining. Kind of like Big Trouble in Little China. If it were like the "Apollo Hoax", however, Roddy would put on the glasses and find that they were just regular sunglasses.
|
|
|
Post by sts60 on Mar 21, 2007 10:31:46 GMT -4
Good, Jason, but another way to look at it is that DH and company are putting on sunglasses with little scenes already painted on them. No matter what they look at, they see the same thing.
Anyway, I loved that movie. "I have come to chew gum and kick a**. And I am all out of gum."
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Mar 23, 2007 18:46:17 GMT -4
just go to hereisnewyork.org look at the hundreds of "immediate damage" photos. Those towers were infernos before they fell. It is unmistakable, if you look at all the pictures...
|
|