lenbrazil
Saturn
Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by lenbrazil on Mar 28, 2007 18:33:17 GMT -4
No they kept saying "possible explosive device" and "reports of a bomb" etc.
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Mar 28, 2007 18:51:20 GMT -4
Just remember it was widely reported in the media early on 9/11 that a truck bomb had been detonated outside the Capital Building in Washington DC. The Media got a lot of things wrong throughout the day.
|
|
|
Post by sts60 on Mar 29, 2007 9:11:19 GMT -4
And not just the media. I was working in Dulles, VA at the time and was told by coworkers that the FAA regional control center up the road by Leesburg had been bombed.
|
|
|
Post by SpitfireIX on Mar 29, 2007 17:53:21 GMT -4
Just remember it was widely reported in the media early on 9/11 that a truck bomb had been detonated outside the Capital Building in Washington DC. The Media got a lot of things wrong throughout the day.
I remember distinctly a report of a car bomb in front of the State Department on ABC news around noon Washington time. The reason that I remember is that my best friend works in downtown D.C., and I immediately called him to find out if he and his wife were okay. The "car/truck bombs" were later determined to have been sonic booms.
|
|
|
Post by feelfree222 on Apr 2, 2007 15:20:04 GMT -4
tinyurl.com/ypj8s3Filmed from her appartment at 36 floor from 500 yards of the North tower Its a military plane she said.Why(?) because the Boeing have no windows.
|
|
|
Post by nomuse on Apr 2, 2007 15:29:39 GMT -4
No more friggin videos! What is the claim, and how is it supported?
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Apr 2, 2007 16:11:29 GMT -4
Another stupid CT claim that makes no sense...
Let's pretend for a second that you're right and the US government is behind the attacks. If they wanted us to believe hijacked passenger planes hit the WTC why would they use military planes that don't fit the description? The government could very easily get it's hands on Boeing 757's or 767's, they could even hijack the planes from the airlines to give their plan that much more authenticity.
So what makes more sense: that the government tried to fool us into believing hijacked airliners hit the WTC but didn't bother with simple details (like actually using the proper model of planes), or that the witness in that video simply didn't see the windows (because the plane was too far away or moving too fast)?
|
|
|
Post by feelfree222 on Apr 2, 2007 22:51:34 GMT -4
Another stupid CT claim that makes no sense... Let's pretend for a second that you're right and the US government is behind the attacks. If they wanted us to believe hijacked passenger planes hit the WTC why would they use military planes that don't fit the description? The government could very easily get it's hands on Boeing 757's or 767's, they could even hijack the planes from the airlines to give their plan that much more authenticity. So what makes more sense: that the government tried to fool us into believing hijacked airliners hit the WTC but didn't bother with simple details (like actually using the proper model of planes), or that the witness in that video simply didn't see the windows (because the plane was too far away or moving too fast)? She said :" its a military plane" she dont say a -Jet fighter.- No more friggin videos! What is the claim, and how is it supported? She filmed the scene from her appartment at 36 floor from 500 yards of the North tower. see video here tinyurl.com/ypj8s3So if no windows are visible on the Boeing at that distance.... Well, of course you can arguing that is because the plane was moving too fast...but wait at the Pentagon the Boeing was moving fast and there was eyewitness who have see the windows even the passengers behind those windows.... or that was their imagination who have play tricks with them.
|
|
|
Post by SpitfireIX on Apr 3, 2007 0:51:25 GMT -4
She said :" its a military plane" she dont say a -Jet fighter.-United Airlines' livery at the time could easily be mistaken for the low-visibility gray of US Air Force aircraft. United 767 in blue-gray livery.USAF KC-10 in low-visibility gray. So if no windows are visible on the Boeing at that distance....When did she say no windows were visible? Well, of course you can arguing that is because the plane was moving too fast.Any number of factors could cause witnesses to misperceive important details of the situation. but wait at the Pentagon the Boeing was moving fast and there was eyewitness who have see the windows even the passengers behind those windows....False analogy. First, the witness in this case was approximately 500 yards away from the north tower, and probably about 700 yards from the point where she would have lost sight of United 175. Second, as can be seen from this picture, obviously taken from almost the same vantage point as the witness's, she would have been viewing the aircraft from about a 45-60 degree angle, and observing the shadowed side. These factors could well have contributed to her misidentifying United 175 as a military aircraft. At the Pentagon, by contrast, many witnesses who were stuck in traffic on the highway saw American 77 fly directly in front of them, at very low altitude, at distances less than 100 yards or that was their imagination who have play tricks with them.Conspiracists are the ones whose imagination plays tricks on them..
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Apr 3, 2007 1:20:33 GMT -4
She said :" its a military plane" she dont say a -Jet fighter.- I never said anything about a jet fighter. My point was that if the government wanted to trick us into believing a passenger plane hit the WTC they would use a passenger plane. There's no reason why they would use a windowless 757 or 767 because they could easily get their hands on an authentic airliner. Why would they settle for a plane that didn't look right? It's much easier to believe that the witness simply didn't see the windows.
|
|
lenbrazil
Saturn
Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by lenbrazil on Apr 3, 2007 8:07:45 GMT -4
We also have no idea how much attention she was paying, she stopped filming before the second crash, then started tapping again, she said something like "Oh my God what's happenning?"
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Apr 4, 2007 23:29:19 GMT -4
A military plane hmmmmm? Yeah Right!
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Apr 4, 2007 23:41:45 GMT -4
No Windows? Yeah Right!
|
|