|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Jan 3, 2008 15:47:01 GMT -4
in the unlikely event that she had substituted OBL for some other person's name and asked for a correction, why not let her overdub it with the correct name instead of removing it? And you wouldn't have been calling it a conspriacy if they'd done that instead? yeah right. |
|
|
|
Post by 911: Inside Job on Jan 13, 2008 21:43:43 GMT -4
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Jan 14, 2008 1:07:58 GMT -4
Were you also wrong about the Columbine massacre being a government op? Or the Madrid Train bombings?
|
|
|
|
Post by 911: Inside Job on Jan 14, 2008 1:29:48 GMT -4
Were you also wrong about the Columbine massacre being a government op? Or the Madrid Train bombings? You must not have watched the video. |
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Jan 14, 2008 8:33:54 GMT -4
ts not unusual for TV interviews to contain mistooks. Lives' are plagued with them and even pre recorded stuff. Sometimes its a slip of the tongue all the way to that chap on the BBC that went for a job interview and ended up being interviewed on the live news show on some subject or another he knew nothing about. Reporters can either try to pick up and correct or let the interview go. They can also miss it altogether.
People being interviewed can also fluff up. Even people that are used to it and old pro's at the game. It would also be fair to say the edit room floor contains a lot of mistakes and a lot of good stuff. Although floor is the wrong word today. Its not unusual for an editor to work on a piece and not know the subject. Working from reporter notes and time codes to edit a piece for transmission or archive.
In my limited experience anyway.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Jan 14, 2008 13:10:06 GMT -4
Were you also wrong about the Columbine massacre being a government op? Or the Madrid Train bombings? You must not have watched the video. Why should I watch a video to prove your point when you just got through telling us videos are easily faked? |
|
|
|
Post by 911: Inside Job on Jan 14, 2008 21:49:35 GMT -4
You must not have watched the video. Why should I watch a video to prove your point when you just got through telling us videos are easily faked? The video is a parody of all the faked OBL videos we've been subjected to over the years. |
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Jan 16, 2008 0:32:10 GMT -4
what video should I watch that difinitiely prooves that the Columbine shootings were a government operation? I live down the road, Mr 911. Please explain it to me. Don't tell me to "google".
I suspect you seriously need a life, and watch (and believe) way too much TV...
|
|
|
|
Post by 911: Inside Job on Jan 17, 2008 22:15:11 GMT -4
If you people would just watch the video (the first minute would do) before you make your reactionary comments, you'd understand that it was made as a joke to show how easy it is to fake a video of OBL coming back from the grave.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Jan 17, 2008 22:23:34 GMT -4
I watched it, and indeed it was a very well done faked video. Quite funny I must say.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Jan 18, 2008 0:07:49 GMT -4
Alright, I watched it. What was the point in posting a low-grade comedy video again? Was it supposed to prove something?
I'm still waiting for any proof of your claims of other government operations at all.
|
|
