Post by on Jul 4, 2010 0:09:05 GMT -4
Jul 3, 2010 21:04:18 GMT -4 @lazarusty said:
How about that he wasn't going to let anyone or anything intimidate him into doing what he knew was innocent. He wasn't going to be robbed simply because of the perverse twisted minds misinterpreting him.
Robbed of what exactly? Sleeping with children? Doesn't that get your spidey-sense tingling? It should. His behavior wasn't normal. Would you have let your little boy sleep with him?
These days, parents are too afraid of hugging and kissing their children in case some neighbour reports them for sexual abuse. It's crazy, society is now rife with paranoia and fear over the issue. And the children suffer because, robbed of natural affection between them and parents which has been twisted into being unnatural, they fall for the first guy or girl that comes along. That's why they have sexual relationships so young and end up pregnant etc before they are emotionally ready for it all.
Are you really equating "normal" parenting with the behavior of Michael Jackson?
It doesn't matter if he slipped under the covers with little kids or not, sleeping with them at his age is not normal (to be kind) and is not the least bit analogous to the point you tried to make.