|
Post by echnaton on Jul 14, 2011 10:03:24 GMT -4
Since the missions were real, anything a hoax believer puts forward as a reason is known not to be true before the question is asked. The point is to ask specific questions to illuminate what the HB does not know and to demonstrate the HBs unwillingness to answer direct questions.
|
|
|
Post by ka9q on Jul 14, 2011 20:06:50 GMT -4
The only thing they could agree on was that the radiation levels were too high, but how they determined this without knowing the radiation levels is beyond me. Why, they got those radiation numbers from NASA, of course!
|
|
|
Post by nomuse on Jul 15, 2011 0:36:25 GMT -4
NASA: We've discovered an invisible belt of radiation undetectable from Earth.
H.B.s: We believe you, we believe you!
NASA: Given the nature of the belt and the short time spent in it, the hazard to astronauts is not insurmountable.
H.B.s: Liars, liars!
|
|
|
Post by Ranb on Jul 15, 2011 2:03:02 GMT -4
I never saw a number for radiation levels from an HB; just that it was too high.
Ranb
|
|
|
Post by chrlz on Jul 15, 2011 4:51:01 GMT -4
Yes, it's funny how they seem to be somewhat disinterested in looking at an issue with proper rigour, much preferring to stick to wild handwaving where they can just give ill-informed opinions, and claims they would have done it different.
So, fattydash, vincent, are you ready to go through a proper, methodical analysis of the radiation issue?
If not, why not?
And before we start, is radiation the 'big one'? Or would you like to keep your options open..? ;D
|
|