|
Post by gillianren on Jul 28, 2010 14:16:19 GMT -4
He never coherently replied to anyone's questions about anything. He blamed it on us for not understanding his writing, but my philosophy tends to be that, if everyone you're talking to is confused about what you're saying, the problem is unlikely to be all of them.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Jul 28, 2010 14:28:33 GMT -4
He is just a guy that wants to be happy in his beliefs and not be bothered by questions or the truth. He did actually take back that contention on the C rock, I remember reading it ages ago....... www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1058921063&postcount=826Just need to get him to admit they didn't fly there in spaceships to take it! That was the only substantive thing he said. The majority of his posts were just chatter to avoid any confrontation while pretending to carry defend his position.
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Aug 1, 2010 4:26:12 GMT -4
He never replied to my request to clarify his contradictory claims about the Van Allen belts. OK, Mr Hagbard. Suggestion here people so tell me off if its wrong but how about we limit the topic to this for a few replies so Mr H can address this one point. Then he can carry on dealing with the others. Just an idea. OK, I am dreaming if this works.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Aug 1, 2010 4:58:18 GMT -4
He'd have to come back first.
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Aug 1, 2010 6:18:05 GMT -4
Yeah, but someone is on his forum pointing out that he run away. Here is hoping he looks in as I suspect and re joins the convivial demonstration on how to prove it was a hoax. With facts.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Aug 1, 2010 15:28:21 GMT -4
Generally, people exhibiting his pattern of behaviour would rather snipe at us from a distance than reasonably answer responses.
|
|
|
Post by hagbardceline on Dec 7, 2010 2:53:12 GMT -4
He never coherently replied to anyone's questions about anything. He blamed it on us for not understanding his writing, but my philosophy tends to be that, if everyone you're talking to is confused about what you're saying, the problem is unlikely to be all of them. "He... He... He..." I know every Skepper loves their ad hominem!
|
|
|
Post by hagbardceline on Dec 7, 2010 2:55:02 GMT -4
He is just a guy that wants to be happy in his beliefs and not be bothered by questions or the truth. "He..." again.
|
|
|
Post by hagbardceline on Dec 7, 2010 3:01:04 GMT -4
He never replied to my request to clarify his contradictory claims about the Van Allen belts. Well perhaps if you show a bit of patience i might. I do have several hundred posts to reply to.
|
|
|
Post by hagbardceline on Dec 7, 2010 3:04:49 GMT -4
Here is my take on Mr Hagbard. If it's YOUR take then is anyone else qualified to comment on it? I think I've got good reason to doubt that the City of London America Company... sorry, United States of America... ever sent anyone to the moon using chemical rockets. You need to realize that the Illuminati are deceptive and manipulative beyond most people's capacity to even imagine! The world as we know it, is a lie! Sorry you don't like the HPANWO Forum. i'm rather proud of it. Skeptics are very welcome there. Take a look and see that we do have them.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Dec 7, 2010 3:05:51 GMT -4
"He... He... He..." I know every Skepper loves their ad hominem! Yeah, let me explain what ad hominem actually means. It means we are attacking you, not your ideas or how you present them. If I called you a moron, that would be an ad hominem. However, saying that you didn't coherently answer anyone's questions is not. It is directly related to your argument, not you.
|
|
|
Post by hagbardceline on Dec 7, 2010 3:06:26 GMT -4
Generally, people exhibiting his pattern of behaviour would rather snipe at us from a distance than reasonably answer responses. That's totally unfair! I've just been busy. Have you seen how many people I have to reply to on this thread!? Not counting the others!
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Dec 7, 2010 3:43:49 GMT -4
Generally, people exhibiting his pattern of behaviour would rather snipe at us from a distance than reasonably answer responses. That's totally unfair! I've just been busy. Have you seen how many people I have to reply to on this thread!? Not counting the others! My comment was from August. Your last appearance was in May. Your return to the board has been marked by complaining about what we've said since your absence, not clarifying your many scientific and historical errors prior to that.
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Dec 7, 2010 6:27:37 GMT -4
"He... He... He..." I know every Skepper loves their ad hominem! Yeah, let me explain what ad hominem actually means. It means we are attacking you, not your ideas or how you present them. If I called you a moron, that would be an ad hominem. However, saying that you didn't coherently answer anyone's questions is not. It is directly related to your argument, not you. Not entirely true. Ad hominem means against the man, it is a method of trying to invalidate an argument by attacking the messenger and not the message. If I simply say "You are a moron" that is simply an insult. It becomes an ad hominem when I say, "You're a moron and therefore your argument is wrong."
|
|
|
Post by PeterB on Dec 7, 2010 7:06:17 GMT -4
Generally, people exhibiting his pattern of behaviour would rather snipe at us from a distance than reasonably answer responses. That's totally unfair! I've just been busy. Have you seen how many people I have to reply to on this thread!? Not counting the others! You've made five posts since your return. We can indulge you with one post for having a whinge, meaning that's four posts you could've used to demolish our arguments, but didn't. Suck it up, marine!
|
|