|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Jun 13, 2011 12:28:16 GMT -4
You say you're not a HB. However, you seem to believe that HBs should be free to criticise anyone, including accusing them of murder and fraud, and that someone else saying, "No, you're wrong about that, because...." is some sort of horribly cruel censorship. I am not a HB, I believe the moon landings happened. I believe that either side of the fence should be allowed criticise the other for one reason or another. This is not specifically biased towards those who doubt the Moon landings. What I do believe Jarrah had a right to criticise some of us for was making Ralph Rene's death out to be a time for celebration. But I believe Jarrah was wrong to accuse Windley of lying about his contact with Brian O' Leary. I never said it was ok for any HB to accuse anyone of murder. When I said Jarrah is unoriginal, I meant that in the sense that he believes the Apollo 1 crew when that was what Kaysing believed. I wasn't saying either of them were right. |
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Aug 4, 2011 9:46:50 GMT -4
4. He may not have great maths skills but he's an excellent reader and brilliant at picking out good quotes to use If he was an "excellent reader" he would read, and understand, the material from which he quote mines. This is not the sign of an excellent reader, he simply searches for phrases or lines which appear incriminating, without understanding the rest of the material on the page. And, frankly, it makes him look foolish to any but the most gullible of readers, who, coincidently, seem to be his target audience. And, while using so many experts' writings as "evidence", he never, ever, asks them that final question "so what you are saying here is that the lunar landings were impossible, correct?" That's just pure deception. And he calls US propagandists!!! |
|
