Playing Dumb with their Eyes Jul 6, 2011 14:17:01 GMT -4
Post by echnaton on Jul 6, 2011 14:17:01 GMT -4
Pupillary constriction is not an explanation I proffered, it is one the astronauts and NASA has proffered. We, the patrons of Apollo , cannot change their story for them. Their account has already been entered into the history books. They say pupillary constriction. So be it. That explanation cannot be correct. Our physiology is what it is.
This seems like an awful lot of nothing. If the account is in fact incomplete, it is just as incomplete for a hoax as for a real mission. How does it prove the missions were faked?