No. I wanna prove to hoaxers that third party professionals know it can be done. How is using Apollo data third party proof??
The satellites that you rely on for communication, TV and weather forecasting. Protection of their electronics uses radiation data gathered by NASA. Understanding radiation in space has massive commercial implications. NASA data has been proven to serve that commercial need. Why do you insist on third party verification? There is a lot of work in this area published in open source literature. If you care to put forward a few bullet points of questions that you may still have then we can work them through. Since I have never worked for NASA, that makes me a third party source.
This is the third time I have suggested this to you in this very thread. A thread that you started. Have you read my suggestion? If not, then why start the thread? If you have, then why do you keep ignoring me?
I have another question for you, and one I have asked hoax proponents. If they cannot trust NASA data, how can they use that data as evidence against NASA?
Can you see who the hoax theory operates. It's dishonest, and followed by stubborn crackpots.