|
Post by dwight on Jun 18, 2006 8:45:57 GMT -4
If NASA wants to prove that they did land on the moon then all they need to do is give the coordinates of all large items left on the moon (i.e.) Looner bBuggy in particular and then any indepenent organization with a really large telescope should be able to locate these items and see independently that NASA did in fact land there. Which we all know they did not!!!! No wait! I have a much better suggestion: If NASA wants to prove that they did land on the moon then all they need to do is give the coordinates of all large items left on the moon (i.e.) Looner bBuggy in particular and then any indepenent organization with a really large telescope should be able to locate these items and see independently that NASA did in fact land there. Which we all know they did not! actually no wait...I have just thought of something that is better than all the above, and to my extensive knowledge of Apollo has never been asked before: If NASA wants to prove that they did land on the moon then all they need to do is give the coordinates of all large items left on the moon (i.e.) Looner bBuggy in particular and then any indepenent organization with a really large telescope should be able to locate these items and see independently that NASA did in fact land there. Which we all know they did not! For goodness sake HB newbies like Atari, can you at least have the courtesy to research a bit before you post redundant musings?
|
|
|
Post by Jason Thompson on Jun 18, 2006 18:33:29 GMT -4
If NASA wants to prove that they did land on the moon
Which they don't, since most reasonable people already accept the vast piles of material evidence already available. How much of it have you looked at?
all they need to do is give the coordinates of all large items left on the moon
The exact location of each and every landing site is already known and frequently published. Absolutely anyone can already get their hands on that information.
any indepenent organization with a really large telescope
You have no idea how the really large telescopes are operated, have you? They are all independently owned and operated, and the individuals that use them have to compete for the privilege because there are comparatively few large telescopes and lots of people who want to use them. Proving NASA put men on the Moon is not going to be a winning proposition for telescope time when everyone else wants to use them for real science, that being the purpose for which they were built.
should be able to locate these items and see independently that NASA did in fact land there.
There is no telescope on Earth that has the resolving power to see the objects left on the Moon.
Which we all know they did not!!!!
Bullcrap. You believe they did not, on the back of just how much research? How much of the film and TV have you seen? How many memoirs from people who were involved? How many books and technical documents? What qualifies you to judge its authenticity? And why should anyone believe you will accept new images when you dismiss the vast amounts of evidence already available, not all of which was produced by NASA in the first place?
|
|