|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 26, 2011 19:41:17 GMT -4
laurel because all the evidence should be included even Sibrel chasing the astronauts with a bible, a first impression is that it was nuts of Sibrel to do it, but in truth, not one astronaut would swear on the bible that they were on the moon, not one! Hi-yo Silver, away!
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 26, 2011 19:24:58 GMT -4
why were Apollo astronauts training at CIA locations? Do you know who Langley was? And why aeronautic and space facilities may be named after him?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 25, 2011 13:53:18 GMT -4
Why would NASA bother to make the propellant tank distribution asymmetrical in a fake LM?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 19, 2011 0:13:19 GMT -4
Its amazing picture, and look stars from the moon Sigh. Another HB posts a photoshopped mess as if it actually means something. Grammar and punctuation aren't your friends, are they?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 17, 2011 12:53:48 GMT -4
If a crater was "expected", and NASA was capable of digging craters for the "fake lunar set", then why didn't they simply dig one more for the LM?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 6, 2011 11:44:55 GMT -4
If the Saturn V didn't make orbit, what was tracked all the way to the Moon by goverments all rouind the world including the Soviets? Something certainly went, if it wasn't the Apollo launch what was it? I asked Mcclellan basically the same question. He just tapdanced away from it.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 1, 2011 8:40:00 GMT -4
Does JayUtah's link provide enough names for you? If so, are you ready to answer my original question? People see UFO:s all the time, and many of them can swear by God that they have even seen the aliens. Should we take their words for the truth? How can we be sure people didn't see a satellite? This kind of "witness evidence" isn't proof of anything. The only kind of evidence I would accept are concrete calculations based on concrete films, not just someone's "words of honor". They did see satellites. Ones that performed maneuvers and events at the same times and places as the Apollo spacecrafts were predicted to be. That's how the observers knew where to look for them. Hey, you're the one who asked for witnesses. If you were going to summarily dismiss their testimony (as I knew you would) then why did you bother to ask for it?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 31, 2011 22:49:27 GMT -4
McClellan, If the third stage never reached orbit, then what did observers see in the sky before, during and after TLI? Who did see all that? Names, please. And who COULD see the Apollo rockets when they were far away from Florida on their way across the Atlantics? Does JayUtah's link provide enough names for you? If so, are you ready to answer my original question?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 31, 2011 19:25:31 GMT -4
McClellan,
If the third stage never reached orbit, then what did observers see in the sky before, during and after TLI?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Jul 19, 2011 16:04:13 GMT -4
Once again a HB spots a Magic Word (this time it's "antipode") used in a non-technical publication and tries to use it to prove that Apollo is a hoax.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Jul 7, 2011 9:58:18 GMT -4
The Pearl Harbor Conspiracy Theory is down the hall and to your left, please.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on May 5, 2011 17:51:35 GMT -4
Sigh.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Apr 4, 2011 2:27:32 GMT -4
Has anyone ever done the calculations as to how much energy it takes to blast a crater from impact or explosives and compared that to the amount of energy delivered by the LM's descent engine on landing?
It seems to me that it wouldn't even be in the same ballpark, but I'm too math-challenged to find out.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Mar 5, 2011 15:46:09 GMT -4
Wait till you get to "Backwards".
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Dec 24, 2010 14:27:00 GMT -4
I'll bite, what’s a hammerfore? I'm not a handy man, but I think you use them to pound nails into wood. (what's a hammerfore? = what's a hammer for?) Surely you jest.
|
|