|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Mar 22, 2006 21:17:28 GMT -4
Red letter day! We've finally found something so outré that even LotR won't believe it Roger that ;D
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 18, 2006 23:49:19 GMT -4
well I was thinking that 'other' means that you do have a belief or idea and 'unkown' means that you just don't know. I voted worm food
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 17, 2006 18:17:28 GMT -4
Then why did you not give the option ,,'Unknown'?
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Mar 17, 2006 18:34:10 GMT -4
Stanton Friedman was the first to investigate Rosewell? That is news to a lot of people
|
|
|
God
Dec 12, 2005 23:41:29 GMT -4
Post by snakeriverrufus on Dec 12, 2005 23:41:29 GMT -4
posted by PW can show you over 1000 hand written documents about the God's existance, and that's just the Hostorical story of the Gospels, it doesn't include copies of history books of the OT, how many do you have for Julius Ceasar? I can show you a large number of paintings and other artefacts that are said to depict God, his messangers and his prophets. If you are going to use this same sort of evidence for Ceasar, why is it not evidence of God?
And not a bit of that is evidence, Paintings 'said to' and religous ideas.
|
|
|
God
Dec 7, 2005 21:28:54 GMT -4
Post by snakeriverrufus on Dec 7, 2005 21:28:54 GMT -4
An atheist friend and I used to refer to an agnostic pal as a lapsed atheist. I use the term "fallen atheist" ;D
|
|
|
God
Dec 6, 2005 21:25:05 GMT -4
Post by snakeriverrufus on Dec 6, 2005 21:25:05 GMT -4
I think the point he is raising is that he simply does not fit the mold of what many people view an atheist to be. Welcome to life. " if you claim not to believe in God, you must believe in satan" are those the kind of thing you are talking about?
posted by ouloncollouphid But surely this God stuff is all nonsense isn't it? Belief in The Bible is no more reasonable than belief in Ovid's Metamorphoses or Norse Sagas. (Or, indeed, to use the old analogies, Santa Claus, pixies or leprechauns.)
this tends to be my view but I don't feel the need to convert any one. A person can have all the faith that they want. As long as they do not try to push their faith on me or bring 'intelligent design" into the classroom.
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Oct 15, 2005 23:58:32 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 12, 2005 22:44:50 GMT -4
Do intelligent people still subscribe to the random chance theory? Natural selection is a far cry from random chance
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 6, 2005 17:43:19 GMT -4
I'ts neither intellengent nor designed
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 4, 2005 15:26:30 GMT -4
I don't know who said this first but it's true,, Intelligent design isn't
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Mar 10, 2006 19:21:01 GMT -4
Sorry but I just couldn't stomach the entire article
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 30, 2006 21:28:35 GMT -4
The problem with this CT is that it is so "all over the place". These CTs need to sit down and narrow their focus. No two of them seems to make the same claim. Of course I know that the chemicals are to enable HAARP to reprogram our brains.
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Oct 22, 2005 2:10:14 GMT -4
Thanks for the links, they will come in handy.
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Oct 26, 2005 2:00:44 GMT -4
Glad that I made it through the 25th
|
|