|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 30, 2009 11:19:20 GMT -4
From YouTube
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 18, 2009 16:32:53 GMT -4
The HB's are amazing at how they interpret what they see without doing true research to explain what they see. Here are three fun YouTube channels to check out. The first channel is a dude who counters HB claims. The last two are HB channels. Astrobrant2's Channel: www.youtube.com/user/Astrobrant2WhiteJarrah's Channel: www.youtube.com/user/WhiteJarrahgreenmagoos Channel: www.youtube.com/user/greenmagoosIts a hoot to look at the HB videos, see their mistakes, and then comment about their mistakes. commenting about their mistakes usually ends up with them insulting you or calling you a government agent. here is another HB channel www.youtube.com/user/un4g1v3n1
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 15, 2009 13:24:37 GMT -4
I'm Mario, from Croatia. I'm making an educational site in Croatian language and after i found out that a lot of people here believe it was a hoax i decided to make a section of the site dedicated to debunking those claims.
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 15, 2009 11:10:17 GMT -4
well, technically it is a UFO because it is an Unidentified Flying Object.
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 15, 2009 9:01:08 GMT -4
You can download for yourself a completely raw scan of one of the contact print negatives made from the original AS16_AS16-107-17446 photo taken on the moon which does not show the "C" at all. The "C" is a piece of lint or possibly a metal shaving which is partially folded on top of itself along the upper half of the letter "C". I now have this photo on my web page. See my signature for the link. You won't like my web page since I work with the raw scans and then proceed to debunk some of the HB claims. we all know there is no C in the photo but these guys think that this is proof of a hoax. apparently NASA airbrushed the photo.
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 14, 2009 18:45:37 GMT -4
even if you took todays film making technology to do it there would still be mistakes. let's use transformers or star trek for example. their special effects look believable and there are hundreds of mistakes in continuity, physics and bunch of other things. these films are good for entertainment but it could never fool the entire scientific community into believing that this was actually recorded in space.
these films are less than two hours long and there are hundreds of mistakes in them.
When you look at the Apollo images and videos you will find nothing strange (if you don't take HB arguments into consideration).
Do you really think that NASA had a guy on the set whose job was to mark every rock in every picture with a letter? Do you think that people who "faked this" would be so stupid to take pictures of a rock with a letter C on it and release it to the public?
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 14, 2009 12:14:57 GMT -4
i have a russian like accent. is that good? for anti-conspiracy videos. since these guys seem to like Russians a lot.
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 13, 2009 10:56:17 GMT -4
greenmagoos also has a poor understanding of gravity and physics behind it. he claims that an object should fall down at the same speed it went up. this makes no sense because the speed of a falling object is determined by gravitational acceleration.
|
|
|
Post by MarioCRO on Aug 12, 2009 17:46:35 GMT -4
since this is my first thread i should introduce myself. I'm from Croatia and I'm a supporter of Apollo program. I've recently talked to one of the hoaxies and he claims that the Apollo 16 LM ascent stage looks badly damaged. He claims that NASA made a bad job on making a fake model. he referenced this image: www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a16/AS16-122-19533.jpgi've checked the LM diagram www.apolloarchive.com/apollo/lm_diagram.gifmy explanation is that this is the cargo storage bay, once the rover and science equipment was left on the Moon it looked empty. Just wanted to check with you guys first.
|
|