|
Post by Daggerstab on Mar 19, 2010 6:48:27 GMT -4
The video in question is the twenty-fifth episode of "NASA: Destination tomorrow": video.csupomona.edu/streaming/NASA/nasa_index.html#twentyfiveAccording to VLC player, it's 28:51 minutes long. See it for yourself. They are talking about "radiation" a lot and saying that it "could be deadly". They also talk about coronal mass ejections and that one occurred between two Apollo flights. They also mention the flashes Apollo astronauts reported... I think that the HB in question completely missed the point.
|
|
|
Post by Daggerstab on Mar 18, 2010 17:47:34 GMT -4
Someone mentioned the article in SourceWatch? SourceWatch is a wiki. Its content is generated by its users. If you look at that article's history, you will see that it is written by a single user. This is basically equivalent to an "article" published on a free hosting site (e.g. YouTube), although in this case it tries to parasite on SourceWatch's authority (if it has any). This particular... person has a habit of sneaking Moon Hoax articles in open wikis. He has done in Citizendium, too, and has tried to do it in Wikipedia, but didn't succeed. You can take a guess about his motivations for doubting the moon landings if you look at his user page in Wikipedia: User:ЛъчезарIt has a lot of... red. Some people never got over how the Cold War ended.
|
|
|
Post by Daggerstab on Feb 15, 2010 5:02:56 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Daggerstab on Jan 16, 2010 15:45:24 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Daggerstab on Jan 5, 2010 4:07:53 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Daggerstab on Nov 21, 2009 11:37:11 GMT -4
Wapedia is a fork/mirror of Wikipedia adapted for mobile devices. The original Wikipedia article has been deleted as a POV fork. The deletion discussion is archived here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Apollo_Moon_landing_hoax_accusersOne of the participants in that discussion has built a nice pro-hoax walled garden on another wiki that I won't mention. (I don't want to give it extra publicity and I don't want to spend precious neurons engaging him there.) Thanks for mentioning this - that discussion allowed me to identify him and his probable motivation. Also, I suggest using Google Translate - I thinks it's a bit more accurate than Babelfish. translate.google.com/
|
|