|
Post by fattydash on Jul 6, 2011 12:13:09 GMT -4
Light/dark adaptation has 3 components.
1) Pupillary constriction/dilatation constitutes 30 fold of the million fold response and occurs within fractions of a second, not minutes as the astronauts and their apologists claim.
2) Neuronal adaptation. The brain itself responding to dark/light. As with pupillary constriction, this too is an autonomic response occurring within fractions of a second. This accounts for roughly 3 fold or so of the million fold dark/light adaptive response.
3) Consumption and reconstitution of the light sensitive chemicals with which the photons directly react. This constitutes 10,000 fold of the million fold dark/light adaptive response. 10 minutes is required to reconstitute the color sensitive chemicals. 40 minutes to reconstitute the "simply light" sensitive chemicals in the periphery of the retinae.
All high level aviators, military pilots, test pilots, astronauts are aware of these facts and in great detail with regard to the practical aspects. Their lives depend on it.
Michael Collins and the others are therefore lying. Playing dumb.
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 6, 2011 12:02:30 GMT -4
I am a physician and lecturer in both physiology and biochemistry. I suggest all medical personal and others so interested take a look at the Apollo 8 and 13 mission transcripts and debriefings. Does one find anywhere anything that remotely resembles an appropriate evaluation of Borman and Haise? No. Borman with feverishness, diarrhea and vomiting in the cabin. The diarrhea in the cabin would of course be impossible to deal with for many reasons.
No evidence of an evaluation, no evidence for appropriate concerns as regards the welfare of others aboard the CMs and no evidence for the occurrence of an intelligent evaluation having occurred addressing the fallout of Borman's diarrhea pervading the cabin.
This is script. This is acting. This is very phony. And interestingly enough, the medical charge would be well aware, ergo, Charles Berry can be viewed as one of the colluders.
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 6, 2011 11:51:20 GMT -4
The fact that Michael Collins and others repeated used the lame and INCORRECT explanation for not seeing stars as having to do with pupillary constriction proves Apollo to be far more bull than far out science.
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 6, 2011 11:45:25 GMT -4
Apollo's fraudulence is quite obvious to medical personal who have paused and considered the details. The fact that astronauts Borman and Haise became sick as they did and never were appropriately "evaluated" demonstrates beyond question the bogus nature of these excursions to where, I know not. As a matter of fact, one may surmise none other than the primary Apollo doc, Charles Berry, was in on the fix. Report to Mod - Link to Post - Back to Top Logged
|
|