|
Post by echnaton on Mar 29, 2006 16:19:35 GMT -4
For those that want a broader perspective on Middle East media coverage, I encourage you to visit MEMRI, the Middle East Media Research Institute.
|
|
|
Post by lordoftherings on Mar 29, 2006 16:30:47 GMT -4
reading for someone biased for Israel isn't a wise thing to do. I represented the anti-Israeli media to show you the other side, bcz it is said that the jewish media is very powerful.
|
|
|
Post by lordoftherings on Mar 29, 2006 16:43:34 GMT -4
us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20060302/i/r1141724659.jpgthat is HIzbollah leader greeting the opposition, now (rulers),leader Walid Junblat. Now all parties are sitting on negotiation table. Look at them laughing to each other as if they never ever faught. This is policy, what shall we do? Now let us get serious. Hizbollah is a diferent experience than other fighting groups in Palestine, or even the ones that used to fight in Lebanon. They are very smart, and know how to play their cards. Hassan Nasrallah in picture is an opponent that deserves respect, as his son died fighting the Israelis. No matter what, you respect a person who gave away his son as a martyr, according to him. Just wanted to say that he is one of the few opponents who I respect.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Mar 30, 2006 1:11:31 GMT -4
I brought up the NYT because I have read many articles over the years that were critical of Israel’s actions in dealing with Palestinians. The mention of ownership was to show that not all Jewish owned media is unquestioningly pro Israel. While your response is just to dismiss the paper without any knowledge. This suggests that you are the victim of the radically racist Arab propaganda media. The is no just no support for any assertions of a world wide Jewish conspiracy.
|
|
|
Post by lordoftherings on Mar 30, 2006 4:36:16 GMT -4
echnaton I opened the links and read everything against Moslems and Arabs. How do you say it is not pro-Israel?
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Mar 30, 2006 17:27:53 GMT -4
Assuming you are talking about MEMRI, since that is the only link I posted. The site primarily translates Arab and Hebrew language newspapers for English language readers. In some cases it summarizes the content of television programs. Since much of the content is from Arab media sources, I am not sure what you mean by saying everything against Moslems and Arabs.
|
|
|
Post by gwiz on Mar 31, 2006 3:46:36 GMT -4
If her research was up to the same standard that she demonstrates in the Apollo hoax threads, I doubt if she looked at more than one headline.
|
|
lenbrazil
Saturn
Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by lenbrazil on Apr 7, 2006 17:55:21 GMT -4
What happened to her did she quit? DH seems to have disappeared too.
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Apr 7, 2006 22:16:56 GMT -4
Yep, they both deleted their accounts. I haven't banned anyone since Trident and Tropicalbreeze (the two who claimed to be Apollo believers who wanted to disrupt the forum) on January 18th.
|
|
lonewulf
Earth
Humanistic Cyborg
Posts: 244
|
Post by lonewulf on Apr 10, 2006 14:17:30 GMT -4
We will not sit down doing nothing, but it is not appropriate to attack civilians. Israel and America both removed natives from their lands and took their land by force. Imagine the British conquering American now. Would you not respond to that? There are some things that I read that I feel that I absolutely have to respond to. This is one of those things. Imagine the Native American populations rising up and trying to drive out the Euro-Americans and African-Americans from their native homeland. That changes the scenario a bit. *ahem* Besides the (rather random) spouting of an opinion, sorry to have dug up an old thread. I'm almost sad to see lordoftherings go; she was an "interesting" character.
|
|