|
Post by redd on Dec 15, 2005 4:14:26 GMT -4
This theory has got to be the strangest...besides the "pod" thing. The theory goes, Willie Rodreguiz(sp?) was in the sublevel of the north Tower and he heard a explosion beneath him(beneath him is the B2 level). Then he heard the crash above. Here's one glaring problem with that. The B2 level is the parking garage for both towers, in other words that level connects both towers. Now the lobby of the north tower's lobby did fill with smoke right? Problem: In 1993 The WTC was bombed, a van filled with explosives went off in the B2 level...(same level) Now when this happened BOTH towers filled with smoke! here's a video from a CT site, which I actually thought was amusing. movies26.enwhore.com/loosechange.wmvNotice the contradictions within the first three minutes? First the narrator tells us there was no soot in the lobby and no residue...then he quotes a witness who was there saying the lobby was filled with soot and jet fuel residue.
|
|
lenbrazil
Saturn
Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by lenbrazil on Dec 15, 2005 9:38:26 GMT -4
Yes that was entertaining!!!
It repeats a lot of stuff we've all heard before.
-Quoting Kevin Reynold's letter and citing him as being from UL 'the same company that certified the steel in the Trade Center' but leaving out the part that he was the head of a water-safety lab.
-Quoting the neo-Nazi American Free Press
-Talking about explosions in the Towers before the collapses as if they could only have been caused by bombs.
-Another part that I found humorous was when the narrator said something about the tripod a video camera was standing on "shaking 9 seconds before the collapse of the North Tower" as if that proves anything.
-It misquotes the NYFD commander who said he thought there were bombs in the Towers. He said something like "We suspect there were bombs in the Towers" and they left out suspect. It was quite funny to hear him say one thing and see his "quote" on screen saying something else.
-It goes on about the extensive damage to the basement (presumably caused by bombs) which was discovered soon after the impact but before the buildings collapsed. It doesn't explain why bombs would be set off long before the "controlled demo"
-It quotes one of the owners of CDI saying there was 'molten' steel in the basement (he probably meant 'melted' ) but then implies CDI was part of the cover-up!!
|
|
|
Post by jaydeehess on Dec 15, 2005 23:47:57 GMT -4
I have asked one question about Rodreguiz's assurtions on several sites and have yet to even get an attempt at an answer.
W.R. claims he heard/felt two explosions and that the second one was the aircraft impacting the building.
the question is; If Rodreguiz was in the basement how can he state which of the two was the aircraft impact? He was not in a position where he could see the plane hit!
Oh , and I would have to say the 'the plane was a hologram' is the strangest theory but hardly anyone believes in it anyway.
However a lot believe in a 'micro-nuke' or a mystery beam weapon caused the collapses.
|
|
|
Post by jaydeehess on Dec 15, 2005 23:49:09 GMT -4
oh, and redd, I have also seen your question about why both lobbies did not fill with smoke get asked and ignored on other sites.
|
|