Post by cameron on Dec 8, 2006 16:35:59 GMT -4
Thought you guys might be interested in this.
Hi all,
New to this forum but genuinely interested in the various topics covered. Obviously we're all different and certain topics are closer to heart than others. Many, I'm personally sitting on the fence occasionally swaying on either side, awaiting and willing to be enlightened. Others, I feel are erroneus.
It was sad to hear of Dean Warwick's death. I did not know him at close-hand. However, I have met his wife, Jean, on a few occasions. Dean was certainly colourful and, shall we say, unusual, but very charming and endearing. Our thoughts should be with her at this moment.
I wanted to add that the various rumours speculating on other websites around his death is maybe a bit insensitive at this time. According to his wife, Dean had a documented medical history of heart problems, the latest episode occurring just before the Conference. He was actually advised by his concerned GP to withdraw from speaking at the Conference due to his heart condition and to rest. Though personally interested myself in the conspiracy world, I feel not all events should be labelled for conspiracies. Regards to what some people are saying about Dean Warwick's death, we need to remember that he was speaking at a UFO/Conspiracy Theory Conference, ready to divulge the "truth" about certain conspiracy theories, to an audience of conspiracy theorists and alien believers. Concerning the rumour details about his death, it is logical that these people would say this.
The last point I would like to make is concerning the Lockerbie tragedy. As a serving soldier on training detachment in Scotland at the time of the incident, my Company were one of the first on the scene. We were asked to help by the regional police constabulary and left the scene when most of the aircraft debris had been removed. Obviously at the altitude it was cruising and the velocity of the explosion, there were no survivors. Any statement on the contrary would be totally disrespectful to the familes of the lost passengers. Familiar with the physics of explosions, explosives and the forensics of post-blast analysis, to my colleagues, like myself, it was quite obvious that the cause was an internally-applied explosion, not exterior-appplied explosion. Basic knowledge on the subject concludes such a view. Also, on-site analysis on the debris, prior to its removal, for chemical taggants revealed a plastic-explosive compound.
Regards,
Bruneval
Hi all,
New to this forum but genuinely interested in the various topics covered. Obviously we're all different and certain topics are closer to heart than others. Many, I'm personally sitting on the fence occasionally swaying on either side, awaiting and willing to be enlightened. Others, I feel are erroneus.
It was sad to hear of Dean Warwick's death. I did not know him at close-hand. However, I have met his wife, Jean, on a few occasions. Dean was certainly colourful and, shall we say, unusual, but very charming and endearing. Our thoughts should be with her at this moment.
I wanted to add that the various rumours speculating on other websites around his death is maybe a bit insensitive at this time. According to his wife, Dean had a documented medical history of heart problems, the latest episode occurring just before the Conference. He was actually advised by his concerned GP to withdraw from speaking at the Conference due to his heart condition and to rest. Though personally interested myself in the conspiracy world, I feel not all events should be labelled for conspiracies. Regards to what some people are saying about Dean Warwick's death, we need to remember that he was speaking at a UFO/Conspiracy Theory Conference, ready to divulge the "truth" about certain conspiracy theories, to an audience of conspiracy theorists and alien believers. Concerning the rumour details about his death, it is logical that these people would say this.
The last point I would like to make is concerning the Lockerbie tragedy. As a serving soldier on training detachment in Scotland at the time of the incident, my Company were one of the first on the scene. We were asked to help by the regional police constabulary and left the scene when most of the aircraft debris had been removed. Obviously at the altitude it was cruising and the velocity of the explosion, there were no survivors. Any statement on the contrary would be totally disrespectful to the familes of the lost passengers. Familiar with the physics of explosions, explosives and the forensics of post-blast analysis, to my colleagues, like myself, it was quite obvious that the cause was an internally-applied explosion, not exterior-appplied explosion. Basic knowledge on the subject concludes such a view. Also, on-site analysis on the debris, prior to its removal, for chemical taggants revealed a plastic-explosive compound.
Regards,
Bruneval