|
Post by Apollo Gnomon on Dec 27, 2008 21:47:55 GMT -4
What coincidence? I've been predicting the the "constant growth" model of real-estate development in my local area would eventually lead to "temporary recession." And now look - every pawn shop in the county has about a dozen worm-drive Skil saws. Usually, there are about 6 in the winter, and none in the spring.
If your source is so freaked out, why only 20 - 30 bucks extra each shopping trip?
I think it's really sleazy to post "There's some more things but I promised him I would never repeat them." If there are things to say, then say them. If you don't want to say them, then don't even mention it.
So do you have any "proof" of any of this? I refuse to believe that the US is building "prison camps" unless someone can show me the contracts/plans/locations.
|
|
|
Post by lazarusty on Dec 27, 2008 23:41:59 GMT -4
All I mean is that it appears he has hit the mark with one major prediction; anyone could say the economy was going to crash but not the month and year. One hit is higher than most, if not all, the predictions posted here, including those posted by yours truly. It gives him at least a tiny bit of possibly crediblity. Also, the predictions weren't based on some "spiritual" source, which I know most of you here are cynical about to say the least, but a physical source, based purely on claimed inside information.
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Dec 28, 2008 0:37:12 GMT -4
Anyone can claim their uncle (or cousin, or friend, whatever) is "high up in the military." It's impossible to disprove it when they don't name the person. "Claimed inside information" is not proven inside information. And I love how his uncle predicted 9/11 but the guy is only telling us about it now, seven years later. After something's already happened, it's easy to claim that you predicted it beforehand.
|
|
|
Post by Data Cable on Dec 28, 2008 6:05:22 GMT -4
After something's already happened, it's easy to claim that you predicted it beforehand. I knew you'd say that.
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Mar 9, 2009 17:59:43 GMT -4
He told me that there is an actual plan as to when the economy will completely crash. As of right now he said it will happen in the middle of sept of this year. Also he said that our Government will crash in Feb of 2009. He said that Mexico and Canada will merge with us and that a new dollar called the Amero is going to replace the dollar. Well, February 2009 is over and the government hasn't "crashed," I think it's about time to declare this a failed prediction.
|
|
|
Post by lazarusty on Mar 9, 2009 22:42:39 GMT -4
Yes, I agree...as regards the date deadline.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Mar 9, 2009 23:03:02 GMT -4
He was wrong about the date but its still a true prediction, eh?
|
|
|
Post by lazarusty on Mar 9, 2009 23:06:01 GMT -4
Wait and see.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Mar 10, 2009 10:23:22 GMT -4
How long should we wait? If the currencies merge in 100 years will the projection still be true?
Some countries use the dollar as the actual currency anyway. Some have use it as the de jure monetary standard through currency boards. If Mexico chose one of these options would that count as a currency union to you in judging the prophecy?
|
|