|
Post by gonetoplaid on Aug 13, 2009 18:33:06 GMT -4
I am really excited. Depending on sun altitude above the lunar surface, even small experiments should be visible as bright single or double pixel specks.
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Oct 6, 2009 23:59:57 GMT -4
Not sure if this was brought up elsewhere, and if it wasn't, how it slipped past... Apollo 12 landing site imaged by LRO Aug 11 '09: Click image above for larger image.Full story: First Look: Apollo 12 and Surveyor 3Cz
|
|
|
Post by stevehislop on Oct 8, 2009 1:36:20 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by gonetoplaid on Oct 8, 2009 11:38:51 GMT -4
My latest video comparing LRO's latest image of the Apollo 11 landing site with Armstrong's EVA photos. I deconvolved and enhanced the LRO photo to bring out hidden details which I then compare to a few of the EVA photographs:
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Oct 9, 2009 6:25:55 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by rob260259 on Oct 9, 2009 10:06:58 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Oct 9, 2009 12:52:07 GMT -4
My latest video comparing LRO's latest image of the Apollo 11 landing site with Armstrong's EVA photos. I deconvolved and enhanced the LRO photo to bring out hidden details which I then compare to a few of the EVA photographs: Pshk, this only shows that They™ faked it really, really well. Apart from forgetting those stars in the sky of course.
|
|
|
Post by gonetoplaid on Oct 24, 2009 0:23:27 GMT -4
Pshk, this only shows that They™ faked it really, really well. Apart from forgetting those stars in the sky of course. Oh really? I've been doing astrophotography for over 20 years and have yet to get stars to record on ASA 1000 film with exposure times of 1/60 second or shorter and a 50mm camera lens set to an aperture of F/5.6 or slower. And somehow the slower ASA 160 Ektachrome film used by the astronauts using the 60mm Biogon lens which had a maximum aperture of F/5.6 plus shutter speeds of 1/125 second and shorter should record stars?
|
|
|
Post by drewid on Oct 24, 2009 9:09:53 GMT -4
I think BertL was joking.
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Oct 24, 2009 13:50:59 GMT -4
I think BertL was joking. I know that BertL was joking!
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Oct 24, 2009 18:29:29 GMT -4
I'm pretty sure I was joking, yeah.
|
|
|
Post by gonetoplaid on Oct 26, 2009 20:10:23 GMT -4
Okay. I missed BertL's joke. Just shoot me. :-)
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Oct 26, 2009 23:29:40 GMT -4
Okay. I missed BertL's joke. Just shoot me. :-) Bang!
|
|
|
Post by james on Oct 29, 2009 6:30:05 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by randombloke on Oct 29, 2009 7:27:36 GMT -4
There's even a video on the same site (it's just a scroll-by of the overall site and not as zoomed in, but still interesting).
|
|