Since the missions were real, anything a hoax believer puts forward as a reason is known not to be true before the question is asked. The point is to ask specific questions to illuminate what the HB does not know and to demonstrate the HBs unwillingness to answer direct questions.
Last Edit: Jul 14, 2011 11:12:36 GMT -4 by echnaton
For those who wish to maintain an illusion, ignorance is the best source of knowledge.
Yes, it's funny how they seem to be somewhat disinterested in looking at an issue with proper rigour, much preferring to stick to wild handwaving where they can just give ill-informed opinions, and claims they would have done it different.
So, fattydash, vincent, are you ready to go through a proper, methodical analysis of the radiation issue?
If not, why not?
And before we start, is radiation the 'big one'? Or would you like to keep your options open..? ;D