Probably because some of us hinterlanders never achieved a self gloating orb like mind like that of our higher learned self professed???
At least we hinterlanders were educated enough to spell correctly and don`t need to hide behind the use of acronyms.
It has nothing to do with "self gloating orb like minds" it has to do with actually learning about a subject before you start slamming it. Clearly you didn't know that the word "Excursion" had been removed from the LM's name well before it was even built, and this is common among that only read Hoax sites before coming here, mostly because the Hoax Proponents are just as poorly read on the matter as their readers are.
One of the goals of this place is education, and self-education is a great thing, I gave you links to educate yourself, but it appears you'd rather remain ignorant.
Don't get me wrong, ignorance is not a bad thing, we are all ignorant about some things, for instance I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to Car Mechanics. It is when it becomes wilful that it becomes an issue. Ignorance can be combated by learning, and then it goes away, but we have to be willing to take the first step.
Things you got wrong in your first post:
"LEM" – No it's the LM (yes I see you have learned this now.)
"all the complex math used to have it running a straight bee line for the moon once up in space" – No, the CSM/LM stack did not travel in a straight bee line to the moon, they followed a hybrid orbit which for simplicity's sake looks sort of like an elongated "S"
"Sorta point and shoot if you will at the right time." – Not at all. The only timing issue they had to work with was to make sure the CSM/LM got there while the proposed landing site was just having its morning. Otherwise the orbits are rather simple and not that time sensitive.
"with ten seconds left to spare." – About 45 actually.
"Who`s doing all the new math in relation to where they don`t know exactly where they are at now sitting still on the moons surface and the Service module making an orbit every 25 minutes or thousands of miles per hour." – You assume that they actually had to. Orbits aren't massively fixed things that once you are in one you can't change it. In this case, had the LM's Ascent stage not had enough fuel to modify its orbit, the CSM did.
"Are they going to crash head on, overshoot their trajectory, come from behind and miss it altogether without enough fuel to catch it because it`s speed is moving at constant velocity or even find the service module at all , way up there ? being no bigger in diameter than my own driveway trying to link up to a Metro sized bus?" – How do planes dock to refuel without crashing into each other? The first GPS satellite was put up in 1978, the F-14 was flying and refuelling 4 years before that without a problem. You seem to not realise that if both vehicles are travelling at the same thousands of miles per hour with only a few miles per hour difference in their relative velocities, the mechanics of manoeuvring isn't any different to if they are travelling at only that few miles an hour.
"Even with the 1969 computer and possible radar system
" – Yes, in fact just a few years before Buzz Aldrin had calculated an intercept and docking using nothing but his brain and a sextant. Having working Radar was a luxury.
"Like threading a needle from a mile away. Time....time becomes very fluid and difficult to handle in such a tight trigonometric calculation especially when there are no known controlled reference points to calculate the math off of or launch timing from the moons surface.." – No it isn't, it's like having a speedboat go out and pull up to a ship in the ocean with the exception that the rules on how to use your engines to manoeuvre are a little different. Once you know those rules, it's as easy as parking your car in a garage.
"How they going to be able to link up, get into the same plane of orbit and have all this extra fuel on board the LEM to catch up and dock up with the Service Module? when they barley had enough to drop out of space and do a controlled decent." – The LM comprised of a Descent Module and an Ascent Module. The Ascent Module had plenty of fuel to do what it had to, and had they run out, the CSM had enough to come get them.
"Put it all together and the little amount of fuel the LEM carried on board in its second tank to do all this work with plenty left over ?" – Yes and even have so over. Once in space the LM used the RCS Thrusters to do most of the orbital changes, not the main engine anyway.
"OH! Yea, who did the spacewalk and go out to the leg of the LEM after it was docked onto the service module and retrieve the film out of the camera?" - There was no camera on the leg of the LM, and the legs were left behind on the moon anyway. The Camera was a TV camera, so it had not film, and it was located in the MESA (Modular Equipment Storage Assembly), or equipment bay if you prefer. The Camera was left on the Moon after being moved to a tripod by the crew.
"You know the film roll that didn`t get damaged or melted from hydrazine burn nozzle, those low angle pictures with the leg mounted camera that recorded mankind's first step onto the moon without anyone else there taking the picture or moon dust on the lens?" – Because the
TV Camera was inside the bay until Armstrong opened it from the ladder on his descent.
"If i remember that first prototype picture of the testing LEM on the earths surface, weren`t the leg footprints much further apart than the actual LEM`s to avoid the heat of the rockets main thrust nozzle?" – There was no prototype test on Earth, I suspect you are meaning either the LLRV (Lunar Lander Research Vehicle) or the LLTV (Lunar Lander Training Vehicle), neither of which were a prototype lander, but rather a flying training simulator for the pilots.
"Not sure how that leg mounted Hasslblad took all that close proximity heat and survived?" – A) it was a TV camera, B) it wasn't on the leg, C) it was well protected inside the MESA.
"The LEM got dumped in space before coming home, so someone had to do a spacewalk to get the film" – Answered above
"or even if it was some kind of link video camera, did they have a small tv station on board?" – The TV signal was sent through the S-Band of the LM for Apollo 11, on 12, and 14 they erected S-Band dishes for better quality , and for 15-17 the signal was transmitter through the Rover's dish.
"And again with the moon dust on the lens? What did they have? A remote controlled dust proof pop off lens cover to record the event?" – No, the Astronauts cleaned it when it got dusty, this is seen quite often in later footage where the camera would get dusty during the Rover movements. They carried a brush specifically for doing it.
"All mystifying.......chain of perfect events....." – Only because you have never bothered to actually study and find out how it was done. Educate yourself and it'll no longer be a mystery to you.
"I`m no physicist or mathematician but i did manage a couple years college, at least enough to understand that triangulation and speed are a difficult thing to calculate when objects are moving." – Total hogwash, if you couldn't do it, you couldn't drive down the road without having an accident, after all if you factor in the rotation of the earth, your car is travelling over 66000 miles an hour too.
" – Yes, in fact just a few years before Buzz Aldrin had calculated an intercept and docking using nothing but his brain and a sextant. Having working Radar was a luxury.
