Topher
Venus
I'm in yo' planet, abducting yo' farmers.
Posts: 31
|
Post by Topher on Oct 19, 2010 22:39:44 GMT -4
Luke, you should know better than to think that there's more to radiation than just "it goes all over the place and kills".
We all know that radiation either kills people, or turns them into giant angry green people.
This is scientifically proven by Marvel comics.
|
|
|
Post by lukepemberton on Oct 19, 2010 23:57:52 GMT -4
Luke, you should know better than to think that there's more to radiation than just "it goes all over the place and kills". Topher, you're on to me. I'm just a NASA shill, part of the network you see. I pray to the great reptilian Windley every night, and sacrifice fluffy kittens and puppy dogs to appease his anger and feed his lies. My favourite argument regarding radiation is that NASA don't release the data so how can we prove that astronauts could survive the belts. At which point I point out that: 'You use the same data as me to allegedly prove they could not, so how can you prove your theory if you don't have the correct data either?'
|
|
Topher
Venus
I'm in yo' planet, abducting yo' farmers.
Posts: 31
|
Post by Topher on Oct 20, 2010 2:55:57 GMT -4
I like the ones where they try to argue a theory that they can't even prove, as if they have all of the evidence for it.
For instance, Jarrah's relay satellite theory to fool 3rd parties.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Oct 20, 2010 5:02:24 GMT -4
It's just like Rodin. If he can think of a way it might be faked, it is faked until someone else to proves him wrong.
|
|
Topher
Venus
I'm in yo' planet, abducting yo' farmers.
Posts: 31
|
Post by Topher on Oct 20, 2010 5:30:44 GMT -4
Well, you can't "prove" a conspiracy theorist wrong, if you look at it from their perspective.
They're shady like that. They'll give you one story, present it as truth, and when you explain to them why this is wrong, they'll slip in a few changes here and there and act like you ignored their other points.
They won't change the theory altogether, they will just change it enough to get around your points and act like they didn't.
Or, they will beat around the bush by using other "evidence" and won't admit mistakes.
|
|
|
Post by lukepemberton on Oct 20, 2010 12:00:13 GMT -4
It's just like Rodin. If he can think of a way it might be faked, it is faked until someone else to proves him wrong. JW's satellite theory is right out of a book called 'How to Make C**p up a You Go Along.' If it was not for the people he was denigrating and insulting, it would be hysterical. I can kind of understand an individual being convinced by the radiation argument, or the blast crater argument or even caught out by the no stars argument. I find it hard to take when it is blatant story telling. This thread has turned into a bar conversation, as we sit and wait for Rodin to get back from the washroom.
|
|
Topher
Venus
I'm in yo' planet, abducting yo' farmers.
Posts: 31
|
Post by Topher on Oct 20, 2010 15:48:13 GMT -4
If he comes back, he's just going to try and prop up his "Portland cement and rake" theory. Last time he tried this on the David Icke forum, he showed a composite image that was taken from lunar orbit and said it was proof that they brushed the lunar surface to spread the dirt.
Until someone pointed out the origin of the picture, at least.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Oct 21, 2010 10:33:13 GMT -4
It's just like Rodin. If he can think of a way it might be faked, it is faked until someone else to proves him wrong. JW's satellite theory is right out of a book called 'How to Make C**p up a You Go Along.' If it was not for the people he was denigrating and insulting, it would be hysterical. I can kind of understand an individual being convinced by the radiation argument, or the blast crater argument or even caught out by the no stars argument. I find it hard to take when it is blatant story telling. This thread has turned into a bar conversation, as we sit and wait for Rodin to get back from the washroom. don't think he will be back. That last one even he accepted was crap. When added to the RCS thruster "shadow" the LRO photos "taken by Kubrick", the moon rocks "made by a secret machine, the vacuum chamber the size of a football field, the need for a special machine to stop the wires supporting the astros crossing over as the astros crossed each others paths and NASA being able to identify up-front and bribe all the independent radio hams, I think even he may be starting to become self-aware. On the other hand, stupidity has no bounds...............
|
|