|
Post by fattydash on Jul 7, 2011 5:03:45 GMT -4
Any chance HB types and official story types might be able to do the debate thing, the back and forth thing, sans the personal stuff, the name calling?
This is a serious question. Am I viewed as so out there that it is impossible to simply argue with me and let the personal stuff go? Do I appear so crazy that it is virtually impossible not to call me names?
|
|
|
Post by trebor on Jul 7, 2011 6:07:16 GMT -4
Hey DoctorTea or whichever alter ego you are today. From reading the threads on this forum I would say people are being remarkably polite considering your tendency to quote mine and back it up with a fine argument from authority.
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 7, 2011 6:24:58 GMT -4
OK, fair enough. But can't they just say what you did? I don't get the name calling stuff.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Jul 7, 2011 7:45:53 GMT -4
A debate requires that participants to answer the questions put to them. You have failed in that by simply sidestepping what has been asked of you. This is a typical hoax believer technique. If you care to debate than respond to questions with facts and logic rather than hand waving and repeating your opinions.
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jul 7, 2011 9:12:25 GMT -4
What name calling are you referring to? Examples, please.
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 7, 2011 10:00:23 GMT -4
For Lunar Orbit, an example of name calling, there are many others. this from randombloke " If you can't understand something as simple as that please leave this board, resign your alleged position as a doctor and go back to high school, where you can join a debate team and start again".
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Jul 7, 2011 11:04:12 GMT -4
You're getting all offended about alleged name calling, but you and your sock puppets have called astronauts and Mission Control personnel liars and frauds multiple times. Seems like a double standard to me.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Jul 7, 2011 11:13:27 GMT -4
For Lunar Orbit, an example of name calling, there are many others. this from randombloke " If you can't understand something as simple as that please leave this board, resign your alleged position as a doctor and go back to high school, where you can join a debate team and start again". That's not especially polite, but I don't see any names there. (Is "alleged" a name?) Really, the way to get along is to back up what you say rather than just make vague handwaves. Pose the question of, "why did the doctors for Apollo do x and y instead of z, which I would have expected?" instead of just a bald opinion that "It's obvious to any medical professional that Apollo was fradulent."
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 7, 2011 11:38:24 GMT -4
I have been consistant in my position as regards the astronuats for years. They lied and participated in a fraud, but that does not make them bad people and their actions in my mind were very understandable. I do not see them in a negative light.
|
|
|
Post by lukepemberton on Jul 7, 2011 11:58:33 GMT -4
I have been consistant in my position as regards the astronuats for years. They lied and participated in a fraud, but that does not make them bad people and their actions in my mind were very understandable. I do not see them in a negative light. This illustrates why I cannot get along with someone that holds your position. Sorry if you find that offensive, but you have been asked ample times to provides citations and references with respect to your allegations. Thus far you show the same CT approach to debate of engaging in a gish gallop. Please state technical reasons for why you think Apollo was a hoax. Was it radiation? Was it technical problems with the Saturn V (or any other vehicle)? There must be a reason why you believe it was hoaxed. Your reasons so far are simply perceived inconsistencies in the record based on your opinion.
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 7, 2011 12:07:30 GMT -4
Perhaps the issue is too charged, as per Luke. I stand edified.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Jul 7, 2011 12:14:27 GMT -4
You show signs of misunderstanding that border on the deliberate. You make lots and lots of unsupported claims. You go the "they're liars and frauds and I admire them" doubletalk route. And you want to know why we find it frustrating?
|
|
|
Post by fattydash on Jul 7, 2011 12:17:31 GMT -4
If I have implied I find the astronauts to be morally defective, evil, bad, I sincerely apologize. This is not my view of them, of their situation.
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Jul 7, 2011 12:41:21 GMT -4
Yeah, you're just calling every one of them bald faced liars...and that's ok?
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jul 7, 2011 12:44:05 GMT -4
You're calling people liars and criminals, and pissing on their greatest achievements, and yet you somehow don't see that as offensive? And you have the nerve to complain about your treatment here?
There was someone else here a few months ago who held that same belief... he works at a hospital too... coincidence?
|
|