|
|
Post by trebor on Dec 16, 2011 19:43:08 GMT -4
Too bad they can't force you to be polite and answer questions.
What Question Would You Like Answered...  These will do for a start,, Spend less time formatting, more time thinking. What was timed in hundredths of a second? The interval between the closing consonant of one speaker and the first consonant of another? From what part were these timed? What was the method used to determine these edges, and can you quantify the error in that method? How did you achieve 1/100 a second timing on a YouTube video? What steps other than watching the video as presented on the site did you employ? Your entire methodology is unclear. You have given insufficient information for anyone to understand your process or to replicate it. (As I said on another board: I am in no way approving of the method inferred or implying that it, or any caveat I apply to it, makes it in any way useable.) Are you going to answer these questions, Damnsod, or would you prefer to just keep hurling insults at members of this forum? |
|
|
|
Post by damnsod on Dec 16, 2011 19:56:34 GMT -4
So You Have No Peer Review Then...Interesting...!!! What forums are peer-reviewed? Peer review is a different thing than online bulletin boards. You do know that, right?
Remember We Now Live In The Information Age...
From Mumsnet Through To The Star Trek Forum...
Jeez Don't Ever Critique Why Transporters Wouldn't Work,
Or If They Did, There Would Be No Need For The Enterprise...
Or Maybe Try It... You Might Be Surprised At The Reaction...
Infact It's Very Similar To The Reaction I Got On Here...
Or For The Grammar Nazis...Am Getting On Here...!!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Dec 16, 2011 19:59:49 GMT -4
Maybe you'd get a better reaction without the dodged questions and rude language. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Dec 16, 2011 20:00:07 GMT -4
You don't know what peer review is, then.
|
|
|
|
Post by damnsod on Dec 16, 2011 20:07:40 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Dec 16, 2011 20:10:29 GMT -4
Nope, parabolic dust arcs. Apollo 16's Grand Prix kicked up a great deal of dust. Haven't you watched the video of it?
|
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Dec 16, 2011 20:18:42 GMT -4
That Is On A £399 Computer... Imagine What You Could Do With Billions Of £££'s Of Nasa Funding... And A Photoshop Programme... Imagine what the Allies could have done on D-Day with attack helicopters... I have as much evidence for that technology as you do for Photoshop in 1969. |
|
raven
Jupiter
That ain't Earth, kiddies.
Posts: 509
|
Post by raven on Dec 16, 2011 20:20:17 GMT -4
That's a still, taken with a 16mm movie camera. Do the same thing to some of the other frames ( I suggest starting at around 17:30) and see your "trees" disappear back into the ground like the kicked up dust they actually are. |
|
|
|
Post by damnsod on Dec 16, 2011 20:27:49 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Dec 16, 2011 20:29:54 GMT -4
Why? What knowledge base do you have to form an expectation on?
|
|
|
|
Post by carpediem on Dec 16, 2011 20:32:47 GMT -4
Imagine What You Could Do With Billions Of £££'s Of Nasa Funding... Send men to the moon perhaps? |
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Dec 16, 2011 20:36:14 GMT -4
Nope, parabolic dust arcs. Apollo 16's Grand Prix kicked up a great deal of dust. Haven't you watched the video of it?
Be The Same As Water In 1/6 Gravity...I Would Expect A Steeper Curve...!!! The steepness of the curve has only to do with the angle of ejection and nothing to do with strength of gravity. It forms a parabolic curve because of the absence of an atmosphere. Just one of many things in Apollo footage that shows it was NOT on Earth. |
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Dec 16, 2011 20:37:01 GMT -4
So are they dust arcs or trees, Damnsod? You don't seem very sure about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by damnsod on Dec 16, 2011 20:41:41 GMT -4
Imagine What You Could Do With Billions Of £££'s Of Nasa Funding... Send men to the moon perhaps?
Fake A Few Pictures,
Win The Space Race,
End The Cold War,
And Funnel Off Billions For The Real Purpose Of NASA,
Star Wars Satellite Covert Warfare...
Strategic Defense Initiative And All That...!!! |
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Dec 16, 2011 20:47:15 GMT -4
I may be wrong, but wasn't the SDI proposed by Ronald Reagan in 1983? 11 years after the last Apollo Moon mission?
|
|
