A question of credibility

[sts60]

Repetition of your opinion is not evidence. Merely restating your belief, which has a number of deficiencies which have already explained to you, in bold, or colors, or with smilies, doesn't make it any less trollish, let alone make it correct.

Address the objections already raised to your claim before repeating it. You're not fooling anyone.

[RAF]

unknown said:

I conduct the game, not you.

I see you have a sense of humor.

I repeat: I have seen again carefully the image of the first foot-print on the moon.
I'm really right: light is on the right, in fact all the ground around projects shadows on the left.

This has been explained to you. Why do you continue to post nonsense?

[LunarOrbit]

I conduct the game, not you. ;D ;D ;D

You think so? I could rid this forum of you in a matter of seconds... I believe that makes me that conductor.

[RAF]

Ya know, I'm starting to get the impression that unknown is "purposefully" trying to get himself banned before Jay's deadline.

That's in about 3 hours, isn't it?

[unknown]

Instead of saying I'm wrong, go to:

www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/home/F_Apollo_11.html

and explain why I say craps saying that the light comes from the right because all the ground projects shadows on the left. ;D ;D ;D

[unknown]

JeyUtah wrote:

"Here are three problems for you to solve to prove to us you really know about flight dynamics. If you decline to solve them, this conversation (and likely your sojourn here) is over.

1. Consider a spheroid spacecraft with a diameter of 3 meters hovering 100 meters above the lunar surface. The spacecraft has a gross mass of 1,000 kg. Assume for this problem that it has the mass properties of a solid sphere of the given mass. At the bottom of this spacecraft is an engine with a thrust of 100,000 N. The throat of the rocket is on the perimeter of the spacecraft sphere. The thrust -- for whatever reason -- goes 2.5 degrees off-axis. What is the rotation rate of the spacecraft in the off-axis plane after 1 second?

2. Solve the problem above with a thrust of 10,000 N.

3. Solve the problem above with a thrust of 10,000 N, but this time an altitude of only 50 meters.

These are extremely elementary problems in flight dynamics. If you can't solve these, then there is no reason to believe you have any basis from which to criticize anyone else. My staff engineers can solve these problems in about 5 minutes. As a control, I gave this problem to a 16-year-old high school physics student, who solved it in about 10 minutes. (He had to find some formulas.)

You have 24 hours. Put up or shut up".

Luckily I am not a student, so get your sister to make those problems. Is nice your sister? ;D ;D ;D

[LunarOrbit]

Explain this, unknown: why would a set decorator make a fake footprint in the way you describe? Why wouldn't they just make a real footprint in the sand on the set? You are claiming they created a reverse mold of a footprint, rather than an impression into the sand... why do that???.

That is one of the biggest flaws in the hoax theory... it's more complicated than it needs to be and is completely illogical.

Which is easier to believe:

1) A set decorator, for some strange reason, created a raised footprint but no one noticed or bothered to correct it. This would have required the set decorator to be a complete moron who doesn't know footprints are concaved rather than convexed (as unknown is fond of saying... even a child knows that). It also makes you wonder why NASA would release that photo publicly and not try to make a better fake in the last 36 years.

- or -

2) The footprint is correct and unknown is simply misinterpreting it.



I vote for #2.

[LunarOrbit]

unknown said:

Luckily I am not a student

So you can't answer Jay's challenge? So how can you claim to know what you're talking about? Why should we believe anything you say?

[sts60]

He won't answer the challenge because he can't. He doesn't know anything about it. He tried to bluff his way, but his ignorance was immediately obvious. Given his apparent unwillingness and probable inability to learn anything, he's simply trolling.

Well, we gave him a chance. But he has a lot of growing up to do.


(fixed word-mash "probability" -> "probable inability")

[unknown]

My challenge is this:
Tell Nasa to build this old crock



Tell Nasa to put on its bottom a powerful rocket engine so that it can fly on the earth.
Tell Nasa to invite all the TV of the world to see how the pilot JeyUtah will be able to keep it in hovering at a few feet close to the ground. ;D ;D ;D

[RAF]

unknown said:

...and explain why I say craps...

I have no explanation for your behavior...

...so get your sister to make those problems. Is nice your sister?

...and I (also) have no explanation as to why you would post crap like this...

edited to add...and you continue to mis-spell Jay's user-name....that's just RUDE...but not unexpected.

[unknown]

What is the right user name of JeyUtah?

See you again soon

[LunarOrbit]

What is the right user name of JeyUtah?

J - A - Y - U - T - A - H

See you again soon

I wouldn't be so sure about that if I were you.

[sts60]

My challenge is this:
You're in no position to issue a challenge.

GoAT.

[JayUtah]

Tick tock, tick tock. Solve the simple problem and prove to us how superior you are.