|
|
Post by Count Zero on Oct 5, 2008 20:38:21 GMT -4
You had it there, on page 14. Naturally, John completely ignored it. |
|
raven
Jupiter
That ain't Earth, kiddies.
Posts: 509
|
Post by raven on Oct 6, 2008 3:58:37 GMT -4
Why bless my soul and whiskers, he did. He completely did. Then he brought up pictures of rock that was darker then the surrounding features, and started claiming it was 'vegetation'.
I love humanity warts and all, but damn I really don't like some of the warts.
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonblaster on Oct 19, 2008 5:57:42 GMT -4
- 1960s computer technology wasn't anywhere near sophisticated enough to send a manned spacecraft to the moom.
- The non-faked pictures were taken by automatic robot landers
- How come all the pictures and videos are so crisp and perfect every time? Because NASA employed the very best film technicians and directors to make an almost undetectable fake
- The Apollo 11 video footage is crap. That must be deliberately done to hide evidence of fakery.
- Only a babbling moron or an evil NASA shill can't see that the landings were faked just by glancing at a single ludicrous photo.
- Gus Grissom was killed because he was about to reveal the
dastardly, cunnningly hidden secret
I've seen all these, delivered with scorching vitriol. Isn't it amazing that the HBs save all their fury for poor helpless dupes, instead of the people who supposedly carried out this vile fraud? |
|
raven
Jupiter
That ain't Earth, kiddies.
Posts: 509
|
Post by raven on Oct 20, 2008 4:41:43 GMT -4
Oh, I have found something that makes me angry, very angry. In gfact I am so pissed, I have to share it. Now most Conspiracy theorist either jsut have the facts wrong, but some, some try to pull a hoax of their own. Like this guy. www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fh_-si2eNw&feature=relatedHe claims that this photo is proof of an Apollo hoax, because the shot is fundamentally impossible. True enough, but only if it is an Apollo shot. It isn't. How do I know this? Well, it reminded me of the IMAX movie "magnificent desolation", and didn't look quite like hasselblad images. So I Googled 'magnificent desolation IMAX' and found this www.ssontech.com/press/press100705.htmIt is the EXACT SAME IMAGE FROM THE VIDEO. Ouch, this man may not be Bart Sibrel, but he is still lying to people, almost undoubtedly intentionally. And that makes me mad. RAVEN GO WAY NOW. |
|
|
|
Post by smlbstcbr on Oct 25, 2008 22:28:16 GMT -4
 , as I posted in YouTube, the back-pack (sorry for the term) is too small or slim. Be not angry (altough, very reasonable), this nutter (the guy from youtube) wins a small battle every time one of us gets angry when seeing/reading his stupidity.
|
|
raven
Jupiter
That ain't Earth, kiddies.
Posts: 509
|
Post by raven on Oct 25, 2008 23:11:05 GMT -4
, as I posted in YouTube, the back-pack (sorry for the term) is too small or slim. Be not angry (altough, very reasonable), this nutter (the guy from youtube) wins a small battle every time one of us gets angry when seeing/reading his stupidity. RAGE. . .SUBSIDING, ANGER. . . FADING, REASONABILITY. . .RETUNING, To. . . normal. Thanks, that was a close one there. |
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Jan 11, 2009 18:21:13 GMT -4
Argument #1 – The Apollo astronauts should have used some of their time spent on the Moon to take photographs of stars (implying that there is something about being on the Moon that would make these photos special).
Argument #2 – The star photos taken during Apollo 16 could have be obtained from low-earth orbit.
There are two problems here: Firstly, the existence of the Apollo 16 photos contradicts the HB claim that no star photos were taken while on the Moon, and secondly, if these photos could have been so easily obtained from low-earth orbit, then this contradicts the claim that there is something so uniquely special about taking star photos while on the Moon.
|
|
raven
Jupiter
That ain't Earth, kiddies.
Posts: 509
|
Post by raven on Jan 11, 2009 22:29:52 GMT -4
Besides, they can't be taken in low earth orbit, as the halo of hydrogen obscures the view, as can be seen in the UV images of Earth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grand Lunar on Jan 11, 2009 22:51:59 GMT -4
Besides, they can't be taken in low earth orbit, as the halo of hydrogen obscures the view, as can be seen in the UV images of Earth. Doesn't the Hubble have UV cameras? If so, how does it get around this? Or are there UV observatories beyond the influence of the hydrogen cloud? |
|
raven
Jupiter
That ain't Earth, kiddies.
Posts: 509
|
Post by raven on Jan 12, 2009 11:36:12 GMT -4
Probably it can scan long enough that usable information is obtained, or maybe it does it while on the night side.  This is a UV image from Apollo 16 in false colour. I am given to understand the haze you see outside the earths atmosphere is molecular hydrogen. At a high enough orbit, one could escape it's effects, I would expect. One place to do this would be on the moon. |
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Feb 23, 2009 3:08:58 GMT -4
I don't know if we've done this one yet, and I'm not going to go back through the two dozen pages to find out, but we've encountered it recently, so it's worth mentioning again. (Well, the BAUT has. But anyway.)
1. It's suspicious that Buzz Aldrin won't swear on Bart Sibrel's Bible. Clearly, that's proof that he never landed on the Moon.
2. When astronauts swear on Bart Sibrel's Bible, it doesn't really mean they landed on the Moon, because it's not really evidence one way or the other.
|
|
|
|
Post by Count Zero on Feb 23, 2009 6:42:49 GMT -4
Good one, and long over-due.
I also got one from BAUT's oxxo thread:
1. Flying Saucers are REAL!!!11!
B. Apollo capsules were not maneuverable, aerodynamic, lift-generating, hypersonic vehicles.
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonblaster on Apr 13, 2009 17:25:36 GMT -4
Neil Armstrong never talks about the Apollo landings. That's because he's stricken with conscience. Proof positive that we didn't go to the moon.
Buzz Aldrin, Mike Collins, Al Bean, Dave Scott, John Young, Charlie Duke and Gene Cernan often talk about the Apollo XI mission. However, they're all liars.
|
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Apr 13, 2009 18:44:47 GMT -4
Oxxo also thought the Apollo and Gemini flights were faked because the re-entry procedure wasn't tested on a dog or other animal first. But he believed the Shuttle is real even though its first flight was manned.
|
|
|
|
Post by fiveonit on Apr 13, 2009 20:05:20 GMT -4
1: "NASA was started by the Dr. Verner Von Braun who was a NAZI! Notice how similar the spellings of NASA and NAZI are!"
2: "The Moon Landings were nothing more than a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy to fool America!"
Yes ladies and gentlemen... we've all been fooled by that elusive, underground group of Jewish Nazis!
|
|
, as I posted in YouTube, the back-pack (sorry for the term) is too small or slim. Be not angry (altough, very reasonable), this nutter (the guy from youtube) wins a small battle every time one of us gets angry when seeing/reading his stupidity.
