|
Post by gwiz on Jun 16, 2006 9:06:43 GMT -4
Hmmm. Just been back there for another look. Most of the recent posts are pro-Apollo, the HBs have gone quiet and one has even admitted he might be wrong about washed-out cross-hairs looking suspicious.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Jun 16, 2006 13:54:13 GMT -4
BTW - nice to see you there Bert! Thanks! It seems the flood is over, though.
|
|
|
Post by ktesibios on Jun 16, 2006 17:37:42 GMT -4
When you realize that all those people likely are eligible to vote, you realize the fear our Founding Fathers had about the evils of the democracy they were about to unleash upon the world. I'm inclined to think that a bellyful of 100 proof conspiracist syndromism is probably a pretty effective deterrent to voting. After all, if all the elections are rigged by Diebold and the parties are just two brands of the same product and it's the secret shadow government who are really running things for the Illuminati conspiracy- why bother getting off your butt to register and vote?
|
|
|
Post by Obviousman on Jun 17, 2006 4:34:01 GMT -4
You know, no matter how many times I encounter it I am still constantly amazed by the number of people who wallow - nay, revel - in their own willful ignorance.
That loose change forum is a study in mass stupidity.
|
|
Al Johnston
"Cheer up!" they said, "It could be worse!" So I did, and it was.
Posts: 1,453
|
Post by Al Johnston on Jun 18, 2006 14:51:27 GMT -4
This is probably old news, but there are others not too impressed with Loose Change...
|
|
|
Post by mndwrp on Jun 18, 2006 23:13:36 GMT -4
This is probably old news, but there are others not too impressed with Loose Change... finally ! debunk the f**kers ! i wonder how many people who lost family on 9-11 like loose change .....
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Jun 20, 2006 1:16:44 GMT -4
I just went over the various Loose Change forums...I feel...dirty.
I reminds me of a bunch of 60s hippies with internet lines...except some seem frightfully far right, and terribly angry.
Scary bunch there...hook, line and sinker. I was surprised there was no online thread to the video they so espouse...it's gotta be a totally devastating tape, from their enthusiasm. (funny to see their attempts to create demonstrations at various events, some will show, no doubt).
They need a life...badly. Ignorant extremism is bad in any form. And I thought 911FT was screwy...
|
|
|
Post by Mr Gorsky on Jun 20, 2006 5:53:38 GMT -4
I gave up on reading one of the 911 threads (about whether or not it was actually planes that hit the twin towers) when one of the posters quoted accounts from several people known to him who had personally witnessed the events of that morning and stated clearly that they saw planes hit the second tower.
The response from another poster was that eye witness accounts simply could not be relied upon because there was too much emotion involved.
Riiiiight!
|
|
|
Post by gwiz on Jun 21, 2006 10:20:18 GMT -4
There's a guy there called EOR who is simultaneously pushing the arguments:
1. The pictures are too good.
2. The pictures look fake.
When pressed to explain what looked fake about the pictures, he said "I have no idea how they should look if they were real, but they for sure would be more convincing."
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Jun 21, 2006 15:52:50 GMT -4
I got lost when somebody said the pie looked like it was made of plastic and the dogs didn't want to eat it.
|
|
|
Post by gwiz on Jun 26, 2006 13:37:19 GMT -4
The latest is that one of Jack White's photos has been easily debunked, leading one of their regulars to say "It made me wonder if the government was doing the same thing with Apollo that it's doing with 9/11--putting bogus sites on the web to cause confusion in the truth movement".
So there you have it - Jack White is a government agent causing confusion to the hoax cause. I really love that. Who's going to tell him and Aulis?
|
|
|
Post by JayUtah on Jun 26, 2006 17:15:01 GMT -4
That should really frost White's kelvinator.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Jun 29, 2006 16:19:59 GMT -4
Hey, Jarrah White popped in there.
|
|
|
Post by Count Zero on Jun 29, 2006 17:02:16 GMT -4
I really don't feel like registering over there. Could someone please point out the following to David C:
1.) Both the video record and the sun angles in the photo sequence AS11-40-5862 through AS11-40-5869 indicate that Neil Armstrong is standing in the sunlight.
2.) Armstong is wearing a white space suit.
3.) The reflection off Buzz's shoe cover indicates the source of light is coming from the direction of the photographer (Neil Armstrong).
Conclusion: The most likely light source for this reflection - that is consistent with all of the evidence - is sunlight reflecting off of Neil Armstrong's white space suit.
|
|
|
Post by JayUtah on Jun 29, 2006 18:39:14 GMT -4
Add that David Groves grossly overestimates the precision with which the location of the hot spot may be measured. This overestimation leads to the wrong notion that the light source must be some distance to the side of the photographer and cannot be the photographer.
|
|