|
|
Post by robvanschaik on Feb 11, 2009 16:52:34 GMT -4
What a minute, svector, aren't you, satweavers, Jay, I, us, and them all one and the same? Forgot me..! |
|
|
|
Post by friptronic on Jul 23, 2009 14:46:09 GMT -4
Brilliant... and absolutely magnificent, Count. Very detailed work! Nicely done. Perhaps now the "BS" will stop  |
|
|
|
Post by grashtel on Jul 23, 2009 14:51:10 GMT -4
Brilliant... and absolutely magnificent, Count. Very detailed work! Nicely done. Perhaps now the "BS" will stop Seeing as the original post was from 2006 and BS is still spreading his stuff in 2009 somehow I kinda doubt this will shut him up. |
|
|
|
Post by friptronic on Jul 24, 2009 10:15:05 GMT -4
Unfortunately, you are correct... the "BS" still continues three years later  And, for your information... I didn't actually see when the original post was made until now. As I said, I am new to the site. Is this how you welcome new folks? |
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Jul 25, 2009 0:40:15 GMT -4
The hoax theory appears to be the only way BS makes a living. He will do whatever it takes to market his product. Shave my head to be "edgy"...ok...
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Gorsky on Jul 27, 2009 5:17:58 GMT -4
Unfortunately, you are correct... the "BS" still continues three years later And, for your information... I didn't actually see when the original post was made until now. As I said, I am new to the site. Is this how you welcome new folks? Oversensitive, much? I don't see anything here that should garner the reaction that you gave to it ... his point, surely, was that three years on from Count's work nothing has changed in the way "BS" goes about his business peddling moon hoax videos. Surely a dig at him, rather than a dig at you for responding to a three year old thread which has been posted in pretty regularly over that time. Welcome to the board, by the way. |
|
|
|
Post by macapple on Sept 30, 2009 19:06:20 GMT -4
We need to appreciate that some people are new to this and look at the historic posts and comment in real time.
They may not be "bathed" in the world of misdirection, fiction and non scientific nonsense that flies in the face of the facts.
We all know it as HBs and the continuing BS they spout.
The problem is that most of these guys ignore anything that refutes their claims as they are all "truth seekers" who believe that "their truth" irrelevant of whether its based on any fact
Even though over the last 10-20 year 100% of HBs claims have been placed in the bin of nonsense by scientists and people who have a concept of science and reality, these people regurgitate the same stuff again and again.
Flat earth society all over again.
|
|
|
|
Post by gonetoplaid on Oct 3, 2009 12:10:30 GMT -4
"Regurgitate" definitely is descriptive for what CTs and HBs constantly do even when they have been proven wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by oopart on Nov 26, 2009 14:54:02 GMT -4
My first post MUST be used to congratulate Count Zero on his excellent work. It is nice to finally find somebody prepared to examine the evidence closely instead of repeating somebody elses findings - cheers....now where is the thread on apollo 20 i joined this forum for....?  |
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Nov 26, 2009 14:55:53 GMT -4
My first post MUST be used to congratulate Count Zero on his excellent work. It is nice to finally find somebody prepared to examine the evidence closely instead of repeating somebody elses findings - cheers....now where is the thread on apollo 20 i joined this forum for....? Welcome.  Is this the thread you're looking for? apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=1000 |
|
|
|
Post by Count Zero on Nov 27, 2009 17:13:03 GMT -4
My first post MUST be used to congratulate Count Zero on his excellent work. It is nice to finally find somebody prepared to examine the evidence closely instead of repeating somebody elses findings - cheers....now where is the thread on apollo 20 i joined this forum for....? Thank you and welcome. Be sure to check out this thread in the "Reality of Apollo" section. My personal favorite is Data Cable's epic pwning of "showtime" concerning Venus. Enjoy! |
|
|
|
Post by astronaut23 on Oct 6, 2010 19:53:14 GMT -4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_SibrelSibrel believes that the technology of the United States during the era was behind that of the Soviets. He points to a supposed "five-to-one superiority" in man-hours in space held by the Soviets over the US as well as highlighting several Soviet space firsts.[6] The "five-to-one" figure has been strongly challenged, with the Clavius website, a website dedicated to the debunking of the Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations stating that the Americans had a clear lead in man hours in space by the time Apollo 11 was launched.[7] LOL....thats what this idiot really believes or he's just saying this to make a buck in his stupid movies?
He thinks Voskod was more advanced than all the things Gemini did? And that two Voskod missions gave them a 5-1 advantage over 12 flown Gemini missions. Surely to goodness he's not really that stupid and is just trying to make a buck with his movies is my guess.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voskhod_programmeComparison with Gemini After the first-generation spacecraft Vostok and Mercury had proved the technical feasibility of manned spaceflight, NASA proceeded to build its second-generation capsule, Gemini, which was a completely new design which retained the successful features of Mercury, like the conical shape with a heat shield at the bottom. But several new features were added to Gemini, for example engines strong enough to significantly alter orbit, docking and rendezvous facilities, and provisions for EVA, all of which were essential for practical applications of spaceflight, namely a manned Moon mission. In comparison to that, Voskhod capsules were simply modified Vostok craft, retaining most of Vostok's limitations. In the end, Voskhod turned out to be a dead end and was abandoned after only two manned missions, to be superseded by the much more capable Soyuz.
|
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Oct 6, 2010 20:34:24 GMT -4
LOL....thats what this idiot really believes or he's just saying this to make a buck in his stupid movies?
He thinks Voskod was more advanced than all the things Gemini did? And that two Voskod missions gave them a 5-1 advantage over 12 flown Gemini missions. Surely to goodness he's not really that stupid and is just trying to make a buck with his movies is my guess. Jason Thompson, a well-respected member of this forum, had an e-mail exchange with Sibrel a few years ago and explained to him exactly why his 5-1 Russian superiority claim was wrong. The fact that Sibrel is still making this claim would seem to indicate that yes, he is just trying to make money and doesn't care about accuracy or truth. See this thread for details. apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=650 |
|
|
|
Post by gonetoplaid on Nov 17, 2010 21:04:34 GMT -4
The fact that Sibrel is still making this claim would seem to indicate that yes, he is just trying to make money and doesn't care about accuracy or truth. You just might be right, considering that Sibrel also enjoys jumping up and down on cars. |
|
|
|
Post by ka9q on Nov 21, 2010 9:50:22 GMT -4
The fact that Sibrel is still making this claim would seem to indicate that yes, he is just trying to make money and doesn't care about accuracy or truth. You just might be right, considering that Sibrel also enjoys jumping up and down on cars. Well, he has to get the money to pay his fines and court costs somehow. |
|
