Missing Planetoid

[showtime]

you data is still open for interpretation, after all a NASA employee might of wipe a booger or dropped a hair on it..

[PhantomWolf]

Well it could be dust or some foreign object, though then one would have to question why it is on the same relative place in each scan, that seems a little more than coincidental, especially with 9 photos.

Of course if you want to argue that Venus should be there, but that, that spot isn't it, well first you have to show why it couldn't be.

[Data Cable]

showtime said:

you data is still open for interpretation, after all a NASA employee might of wipe a booger or dropped a hair on it..

So, you claim a white spot in almost exactly the same position relative to the earth in 9 consecutive photos might be a "booger" or a "hair." Fascinating.

[SpitfireIX]

So, you claim a white spot in almost exactly the same position relative to the earth in 9 consecutive photos might be a "booger" or a "hair." Fascinating.

It's a whistle-blow.

[Data Cable]

spitfireix said:

It's a whistle-blow.

Through a snotty and/or hairy whistle, apparently.

[Retrograde]

datacable said:

spitfireix said:

It's a whistle-blow.

Through a snotty and/or hairy whistle, apparently.

So if I may sum up where we are:

a) If a spot of light does not appear in the photographs where Venus ought to be, then the moon landings were hoaxed.

b) If a spot of light does appear in the photographs where Venus ought to be, then the moon landings were hoaxed.

Have I got it right?

[showtime]

I was well aware of that abnormality, before I posted , & knew that it would eventually, be brought up. But it does seem to be very dim for Venus, it could be the result of a double exposure. Besides you seemed to have a lull in nothing to debunk lately, & were bored. I fear, I may have gave the Apollo believers more ammunition & thats why I didn't post it alot earlier. But as Apollo believers , you should also be providing some proof of your own & not just waiting to debunk...I apologize to the Hoax believers for leading them down the path to possible proof , although it's debatable..

[AtomicDog]

Sure, showtime, you knew it was there all the time. Right.

[Bob B.]

showtime said:

But as Apollo believers , you should also be providing some proof of your own..

NASA has already done that.

[showtime]

Normally, it doesn't bother me when someone calls me a lair, especially if I was lying..But since I am telling the truth, you should just ST-U...

[Retrograde]

showtime said:

But as Apollo believers , you should also be providing some proof of your own & not just waiting to debunk...

I'm of the opinion that the people at this board already spend way too much time dancing to the tune that you call. But it's their time, they can spend it how they like. . .

[Cavorite]

showtime said:

But it does seem to be very dim for Venus

Judged by what criteria? Do you know how bright Venus should be with the camera settings used to take those photos?

[AtomicDog]

showtime said:

Normally, it doesn't bother me when someone calls me a lair, especially if I was lying..But since I am telling the truth, you should just ST-U...

When you come in here playing games with us, you leave yourself open to that interpretation.

[showtime]

;D ;D Well, you got me there ;D

Your right I apologize,,sorry

But you guys leave me no choice but too take you down a path of my choosing..

[Bob B.]

showtime said:

But you guys leave me no choice but too take you down a path of my choosing..

It is our choice to discuss Apollo because we find it an interesting and inspiring subject. Why do you choose to discuss it?