|
Post by Moon Man on Dec 12, 2006 17:55:03 GMT -4
Hahaha!
Hi sts. I think I missed you the most from here.
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Dec 12, 2006 17:34:54 GMT -4
That b@$tard got what he deserved.
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Apr 7, 2006 14:38:58 GMT -4
Photo radar sucks. I'm glad they scraped it. It was the only good thing Harris did.
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Apr 7, 2006 14:29:37 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 20:29:38 GMT -4
It's not really something that can be explained in a post or two. Remember that its background is well-rooted in some pretty heavy maths. That said, I have to hand a smallish book entitled, Relativity/The Special and the General Theory and sub-titled "A Clear Explanation That Anyone Can Understand." I've read it a couple of times. Crown publishers, ISBN 0-157-025302. The author is a genial-looking German professor whose name escapes me at the moment. You don't need heavy duty maths to understand relativity, but if you want to understand how it was developed, you do need them. Amazon has it, of course.Fred Thanks. Einstein, eh? I've been reading some Adam Smith lately and that dudes books are a hard read as well. Ha! I have the book on my desk as I write! Opps, the link didn't work. QC 6 E55 1961 1961 Relativity : the special and the general theory : a popular exposition 15th ed. Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 20:27:12 GMT -4
It keeps being referred to in subjects I'm reading. I have no clue what it is. I wonder how many apples fell on Newtons head before he took the clue...?
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Apr 7, 2006 12:54:42 GMT -4
The theory of relativity.
I have to split now but I'll check in next time.
Please make your explanation simply.
Thanks folks.
Have a great day!
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Nov 20, 2005 5:56:35 GMT -4
I voted no because it's not doable, so why pretend.
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Nov 20, 2005 4:35:13 GMT -4
Couldn't you just buy a mirror? Ha! Now that was funny!
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Mar 5, 2006 16:48:56 GMT -4
It's a moon hoax board, for crying out loud. No wonder it's dead in here without me.
I'm a weapon of mass attraction.
Hello to all my friends out there!!
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Nov 20, 2005 6:44:47 GMT -4
The USA wanted rockets to launch WMD to Russia, not to go to space. They had over 1 million man hours in this before JFK's speech, and that was in 61. There was no space race and if there was Russia already won it. Simply believing the Russia never went to the moon because the USA did it first makes no sense. They didn't go because it's not doable. As you said, companies were hired to build all the compentants. Those companies, and the employees thereof, didn't know if going to the moon was doable, they just built the compentants to the specs they were given. They watched Apollo just like everyone else and believe it was real, and you'll never convince them otherwise. And who knows if every company was private, they may've been, but I'd bet some were not, or they had contracts with the US military. Take the Stealth bomber, for example. Built in the late 80's, not the 60's, and no one knew it existsed until maybe the Gulf war in 91. Which company built that plane and why was it a secret..? Who would imagine that in the 80's Reagan would be promoting a Just Say No To Drugs slogan while trading drugs for arms..? Who would image in the 90's Clinton would lie on national TV..? Would would imagine in the 00's Bush would lie about Iraq's WMD and their connection to 911..? Lying is nothing new to the USA or Canadian government. Canadian tax payers were scammed by our government officials for over 100 million $ and the guilty pricks who forced documents and submitted bogus expense claims are all going to walk scott free while we pay another 100 million $ in investigation costs while they continue to lie about it. The scam took place from 95-99 and we just found out. What te engineers developed didn't go to waste as they use most of it in the shuttle, but I think it's pretty plain to see that themoon landing never really happened. The camera to pan and tilt on Apollo 17, that we're debating in one thread, never existed in 72. Look how small it was and it was radio controlled. And remember, it's a TV camera and not a video camera. It's not believable.
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Nov 20, 2005 5:50:00 GMT -4
Coolio, Wolf. Good luck with it. I was just reading your hoax page in the other section on here. I have two thoughts on Nixon. He knew it was a hoax because he directed it, or, Johnson was the scammer and Nixon was hoaxed like the rest of us and when he finally found out he put a stop to it by canceling the remaining missions.
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Nov 20, 2005 4:41:55 GMT -4
Wolf, you should talk to scooter, Dave, on here. It said it was into rockets and it might not have seen this thread.
I built a neat rocket with a friend. It's a cannon more than a rocket, really. We took 5 or 6 empty pop cans and put a small hole in the bottom of each can. We taped the cans together. we cut the top of the top can off. You pour some lighter fluid in the bottom can and then shake the cannon up for a few seconds. We then put a tennis ball in the top can that we had cut open and light the the bottom can where the lighter fluid was inserted and BOOM, the tennis ball shoots out like a rocket.
|
|