|
Post by unknown on Jun 6, 2005 10:13:09 GMT -4
Do you like censorship? I don't think the other persons that read me every day agree with you. Are you afraid of my opinions? Are not you tha land of freedom? What is a troll?
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 6, 2005 1:16:35 GMT -4
Hey datacable,
is not your country the most powerful in the world? Why are your movies the most ugly in the world?
If you want to demonstrate your powerfull to all the world, go close to Mars and film it raising from the darkness of universe using 30 frames per second. THAT WOULD BE A MARVELLOUS AND FANTASTIC SIGHT. THAT WAY YOU WOULD DEMONSTRATE YOUR POWERFUL not with ugly movies that jerk along like films made in 1900. Go on Mars and film panorama using 30 frames per second, don't film thousands of stones, FILM PANORAMA WITHOUT WIDE-ANGLE LENS. SPIRIT LOOKS LIKE A HUMAN-EYED OSTRICH AND IT'S EASY FOR IT TO LOOK AT EVERY DIRECTION. IF YOU CAN'T DO IT, IT MEANS YOU ARE NOT ON MARS AND ALL YOUR MOVIES ARE FAKED. ;D ;D ;D
Nasa can't say today with the new hard disks that their movies are made this way not to store too many data. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 17:05:52 GMT -4
sts60 wrote:
"1. Because, for the third time, it's not from any kind of motion-picture (film/TV/video) camera. And there is no standard frame rate for time-lapse photography display".
Has not JayUtah yet invented a system to receive from 500 million kilometers 30 frames per second? And yet this is his job.
"2. Both rovers use cameras with various fields of view. See this page for their basic characteristics and applications".
Crap fields of view how we can see in the movies of Spirit. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 16:02:10 GMT -4
Hey sts60 I know the movie is not in real time but tell me:
1 - Why does not Nasa use the standard of 30 frames per second?
2 - Why does Spirit use wide-angle lens?[/color]
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 14:31:41 GMT -4
LunarOrbit wrote: "So I guess humans are too complicated... we only need a narrow field of view because we can turn our heads. Right?
Why would they need to program the rover to turn it's head constantly... "
Why constantly? Spirit needed only one turn to see if there were some obstacles. In that movie we don't see any obstacles. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 13:53:18 GMT -4
datacable wrote: "The vehicle onto which the camera is being built would have rotated, causing the rock to come into the frame again".
You don't understand anything about images and movies: to film the same stone from slightly different angles, Spirit had to move quickly on the left since the strange stone has gone out of the scene on the left. Spirit could not do it so quickly. ;D ;D ;D
And I repeat: LunarOrbit wrote: "This has already been explained to you. The Mars rovers use wide angle lenses for navigation... they need to see not just what is in front of them but also to their sides. It's the same reason people have peripheral vision".
Spirit looks like a human eyed ostrich. It can turn its head in all directions. It doesn't need wide-angle lens to move safely. This is the biggest crap I have heard till now. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 13:34:47 GMT -4
I wrote: "But movies of Spirit are too ridiculous: only children see they are faked".
I wanted to say: "also children see they are faked" obviously. ;D ;D ;D
LunarOrbit wrote: "This has already been explained to you. The Mars rovers use wide angle lenses for navigation... they need to see not just what is in front of them but also to their sides. It's the same reason people have peripheral vision".
Spirit looks like a human eyed ostrich. It can turn its head in all directions. It doesn't need wide-angle lens to move safely. This is the biggest crap I have heard till now. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 6:44:40 GMT -4
With compliments. You also have seen the second scene shows the identical "formations of stones".
There is only a little problem: if the camera is moving on the right and that strange stone has gone out of the scene on the left, how could the camera film it "from slightly different angles" in a shortest time?
Does also the camera jerk along?
In 1969, at the beginning of the space race, cameras were not yet reliable and jerk along. But today why does Nasa use 6 frame per second and not the standard (30 frame per second?). Have not they enough money to buy better cameras?
Why does Nasa use that orrible wide-angle lens?
INTELLIGENT ANSWER: to musk their films are faked.
Nasa would have gone to Mars to demonstrate that USA are the most powerful country in the world.
But movies of Spirit are too ridiculous: only children see they are faked. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 2:45:44 GMT -4
Finally I have found the proof that the movies of Spirit are faked. ;D ;D ;D
Go to: marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20050308a.html and save the movie on your desktop. Run Corel Photo-Paint and open that movie. Go to frame 60: look at that strange stone almost in the middle of the scene. Go to frame 64: look at the same strange stone only a little bigger.
Can stones on Mars procreate other identical stones?
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 4, 2005 17:04:09 GMT -4
The others have given me unintelligent answers to my questions. Please go to marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/video/movies/spirit/243Sols.movie.movAt the end of that movie you can see the shadow of Spirit that extends for large part and it is almost close to the horizon. Since Spirit is using wide-angle lens (for what reason?)looking at the ground, that means Spirit pojects a shadow of many kilometers. Don't you think that movie is faked?Mars looks like a little balloon. Ridiculous. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 4, 2005 15:36:02 GMT -4
Yes, I have no desire to learn craps. Try to say intelligent things and I will learn. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 4, 2005 13:23:08 GMT -4
I wrote "but you are able to drive your probe to a target of 500 million kilometers distant". sts60 wrote: "Mars is never 500 million km distant from Earth. This has already been explained to you. And, yes, we can "drive" a probe there, or to Jupiter, Saturn, and beyond, with great accuracy. That's because there are people who actually learn and do things".
With compliments. But explain how you can do it. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 4, 2005 10:45:21 GMT -4
sts60 wrote: "So, yes, I have found software that can drive probes to targets hundreds of millions of kilometers distant. It's on various spacecraft ranging through the Solar System. It has nothing to do with magic, and everything to do with the science of astrodynamics".
Can your software see the probe that is going to Mars? No, o.k.? How can your software drive the probe if it doesn't see where it is? ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 3, 2005 17:18:48 GMT -4
Bob B. wrote: "After you've worked through all the example problems and gained at least a moderate level of proficiency, please come back to this forum and we will discuss orbital mechanics on an intelligent level. If the above Web page is above your understanding, then you have no business commenting on the dynamics of interplanetary trajectories".
Orbital mechanics is very interesting. It's a pity that you can't apply your theories in real world since you can't see the objects and then you can't execute any manoeuvers with them. What a pity, I'm really sorry. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 3, 2005 15:57:55 GMT -4
Bob B. wrote: "Shouldn't this thread be moved to "Other Conspiracy Theories"?"
Hey, I'm not a conspirator, I'm only a little child that hates those who want to make game of me.
The earth runs at 100,000 kph around the sun along its orbit, Mars does about the same along another orbit, you can't see your probe, you can't see Mars but you are able to drive your probe to a target of 500 million kilometers distant. You are really little children that believe to fables. ;D ;D ;D
|
|