|
|
Post by banjomd on May 25, 2010 5:24:10 GMT -4
Just read his book....very very interesting and entertaining to say at least. Wendt's book is the one that describes a rather cruel practical joke that Alan Shepard pulled on somebody, right? As I recall, Shepard let somebody borrow his car, then called NASA security and reported it stolen. As a joke. Yes, pp15-16 . He lent it to Walt Williams. |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on May 24, 2010 14:36:19 GMT -4
Nice!
|
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on May 11, 2010 21:31:53 GMT -4
#3270 is a FAKE; there are stars in the sky, the dust is not billowing, the shadows are not parallel, It was obviously faked... ON THE MOON!  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on May 4, 2010 9:56:02 GMT -4
I vonder vere Guenter Wendt."  |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on May 3, 2010 7:45:42 GMT -4
Thanks for the heads-up, Obviousman.
|
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 29, 2010 23:12:38 GMT -4
Fear of reality |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 28, 2010 16:21:49 GMT -4
There is just one shot which is suspicious. This one here: www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=n1UEv2PIzl4 Now ssomebody suggested that static electricity can produce this effect, but a static discharge, like one in your clothes, causes a clinging or attracting effect. This time the flag moves as if it is being moved by air that is disturbed by the astronaut's body as he walks past. I whole heartedly disagree that the flag looks like it was moved by air. If air were present, the flag wouldn't continue to rock back and forth in a pendulum-like fashion; the motion would quickly dampen and cease due to air resistance. You can't have air cause the motion and then have that motion act as if there is no air. I agree. That flag "swings" back and forth from 2:37 to 3:12 ; I counted no less than 15 back & forth (diminishing amplitude) cycles. Try to get that in air. |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 28, 2010 11:14:53 GMT -4
Not necessary but heartfelt.
Now back to beating the dog! (just kidding; I love him!)
|
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 28, 2010 8:39:07 GMT -4
I'm sorry for rushing to judgement based on your early posts. You seem to be open minded and willing to accept evidence on a logical and scientific basis. (I still dislike the movie! ) |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 26, 2010 8:17:06 GMT -4
15 pages so far; let's see: hasn't answered a question (only asks more), hasn't a clue as far as the timeline, makes accusations without the evidence to back it up... I'm betting he won't write the list! |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 25, 2010 16:52:43 GMT -4
Lots of talk but no answers!
I'd love to see an answer to laurel's question (that'd be the one that has been posted multiple times and, so far, ignored).
|
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 25, 2010 9:01:04 GMT -4
2. Near the end of the Gemini project and before Apollo got under way, how exactly was the USSR ahead of the United States? Wonderful question; I doubt that you'll get an accurate answer! |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 24, 2010 17:33:00 GMT -4
... the Space Race was becoming too one-sided; the Russians were so far ahead that it was becoming boring... Absolute ignorance of history!  |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 13, 2010 7:10:13 GMT -4
"Not available in your area." Drat |
|
|
|
Post by banjomd on Apr 5, 2010 17:20:49 GMT -4
Retract, it's never too late!
(Just don't retract the antennae!) ;D
|
|
;D
