|
Post by Count Zero on Aug 27, 2007 2:11:25 GMT -4
Heh. We could have a whole thread of just Futurama quotes. Go grab the DVDs (if you don't have them already).
Oh, and welcome to the land of the de-lurked, cr!
|
|
|
Post by cr on Aug 27, 2007 16:23:19 GMT -4
Thanks! (Runs off to re-watch Futurama dvd sets...)
|
|
|
Post by grashtel on Aug 27, 2007 18:26:07 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by dwight on Aug 28, 2007 4:43:11 GMT -4
Is it just me, or are the HB claims of fakery getting more bizarre? I mean over at BAUT some bloke claimed the missions were faked because of some obscure flag-raising law, and now we're discussing underwater trickery??? I have never seen a group so obsessed on winning who go to such measures, ever.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Aug 28, 2007 10:46:33 GMT -4
Flag-raising law? As in they couldn't raise a flag on the moon? If that was the reason why didn't they go to the moon and not raise a flag?
|
|
|
Post by grashtel on Aug 28, 2007 11:30:05 GMT -4
Flag-raising law? As in they couldn't raise a flag on the moon? If that was the reason why didn't they go to the moon and not raise a flag? Apparently leaving the flags on the Moon wasn't showing proper respect to them or something because they weren't continually lit or something like that, if you really want to know this is the thread
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Aug 28, 2007 12:08:42 GMT -4
I suppose that means that all attempts at mountainclimbing are also faked, since it would be disrespectful to leave a flag there.
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Aug 28, 2007 17:09:38 GMT -4
Once all your old canards have been repeatedly destroyed, you start clutching wildly for any straw you can find blowing in the wind.
See the same in the 9/11 movement. There are two main groups now. Those that keep moving closer and closer to the MS version (heck even LC:FC is apparently dropping the Twin Towers were CDs line and focusing on WTC 7 and has totally dropped the Cell Phone calls, well if you believe anything Dylan says, ever...) and those that just keep getting more and more out there, space beams, nukes, and flyovers. One of them even endorsed the Onion's single plane theory as a source, and do you need to be reminded about "Clunity clunk"?
The Apollo Hoaxsters are heading the same way. They know that the "good" arguments are gone. They can't say "no stars, no dust, slow motion, shadows wrong, extra lighting" now (well the newbies do, but then even in 9/11 we still see the newbies try the "Pod on the plane" or or some other 2002 argument) thus they have to reach for new material and so start coming up with these way out and wacky ones. It probably isn't helped that the HPs are content with their videos and books creating money as they are, so they don't have to create new stuff to throw out. That leaves the HBs in a vacuum and not being feed the lines from the HPs. Since for the most part they seem to be actually incapable of independant though, when cut off from a new source of woo, they are left to argue the same things, or whatever happens to pop into their heads regardlessof how way out it is.
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Aug 28, 2007 20:23:04 GMT -4
"Dumb and dumber" comes to mind...
|
|