|
|
Post by altair4 on Jan 18, 2008 19:27:59 GMT -4
back again
go to "The Real Moon Studio" on Youtube
what do I think...you can fool some of the people all the time,but not all the people all the time..
Is this Scott Carpenter??How would the astronauts feel about live coverage not getting back 2 Earth and its "coverage" which is televised is not real(substituted??? do U think they would have said something about it??
4 Me...they walked on the moon!!! WELL DONE APOLLO!!
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Jan 18, 2008 19:40:30 GMT -4
I thought they spoke English in New Zealand.
|
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Jan 18, 2008 20:39:07 GMT -4
What does Scott Carpenter have to do with the moon landings?
|
|
|
|
Post by JayUtah on Jan 18, 2008 21:03:26 GMT -4
You're being pretty obscure, Altair4. Are you claiming the live coverage of the Apollo missions was not genuine? Are you claiming the crew knew about this and is keeping silent about it?
|
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jan 18, 2008 23:49:54 GMT -4
Altair4, you seem to be implying that the Apollo footage is not authentic. This topic belongs in the "The Hoax Theory" section of the forum, so in the future please place topics in the proper forum. If I have to constantly move topics that you start I will not be happy. Just so that it is perfectly clear, this is what the different forum sections are intended for: - The Hoax Theory is for any topic that involves a conspiracy theory regarding the Apollo moon landings. If you believe NASA faked the landings in a studio, or that the landings were real but NASA is covering up some part of it (like the discovery of aliens etc.) discuss it in that section.
- The Reality of Apollo is for discussing the documented, historically recorded aspects of Apollo (ie. "the official story"). If a topic posted here contradicts what is said to have happened you had better be prepared to prove it with more than just a YouTube video. Repeatedly posting hoax theory topics in this section is a sure-fire way to get yourself banned.
- Clavius Moon Base is for commenting on JayUtah's website.
- General Discussion is open to just about any subject as long as it is in good taste and doesn't violate any of the forum rules.
- Other Conspiracy Theories is pretty obvious, discuss 9/11, the JFK assassination, etc. here.
- Beyond Belief is for discussions about religion, the supernatural, UFOs, bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, etc.
- Tech Support is where you can report technical problems etc. regarding the forum.
Continually posting topics in the wrong forum category is going to annoy me and will eventually lead to repeat offenders being banned. |
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Jan 19, 2008 15:55:35 GMT -4
How would the astronauts feel about live coverage not getting back 2 Earth and its "coverage" which is televised is not real(substituted??? do U think they would have said something about it?? If I am "translating" this correctly, you are asking what the astronauts would do if they found that the real TV transmissions were being substituted with "fake" TV transmissions. Well, unless you can show some kind of credible evidence that there actually were "faked" TV transmissions, then your question is pointless. |
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Jan 19, 2008 17:00:54 GMT -4
back again go to "The Real Moon Studio" on Youtube what do I think...you can fool some of the people all the time,but not all the people all the time.. Is this Scott Carpenter??How would the astronauts feel about live coverage not getting back 2 Earth and its "coverage" which is televised is not real(substituted??? do U think they would have said something about it?? 4 Me...they walked on the moon!!! WELL DONE APOLLO!! Again, I'm having a hard time understanding what you are saying. But in answer to your second question - I don't think any of the astronauts would go along with fakery of any kind. That would include if the transmissions weren't genuine. That's only my opinion. What I don't get is that you say you believe the moon landings were real but keep linking to Youtube videos which either are ambiguous or hint at a conspiracy of some sort . My main problem in analyzing your posts is trying to understanding what you are posting in the first place. Scott Carpenter was one of the original Mercury astronauts BTW. He did was not on any Gemini or Apollo missions. |
|
|
|
Post by PeterB on Jan 19, 2008 23:21:33 GMT -4
back again go to "The Real Moon Studio" on Youtube what do I think...you can fool some of the people all the time,but not all the people all the time.. I watched the video in question, and wondered who the narrator was trying to fool by repeatedly saying this was the actual Lunar Module which made the second landing on the Moon. |
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Jan 20, 2008 4:55:04 GMT -4
back again go to "The Real Moon Studio" on Youtube what do I think...you can fool some of the people all the time,but not all the people all the time.. I watched the video in question, and wondered who the narrator was trying to fool by repeatedly saying this was the actual Lunar Module which made the second landing on the Moon. I was wondering that too, until I saw a picture of LM-2 on display at the NASM in D.C.  which looks suspiciously a LOT like the LM in the video. So, potentially, the narrator could have confused "LM-2" to mean the second lunar module to go to to the moon, rather than the second lunar module to be built. Cz |
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Jan 20, 2008 15:50:26 GMT -4
How would the astronauts feel about live coverage not getting back 2 Earth and its "coverage" which is televised is not real(substituted??? do U think they would have said something about it?? If I am "translating" this correctly, you are asking what the astronauts would do if they found that the real TV transmissions were being substituted with "fake" TV transmissions. I think this is correct, I haven't run it through my teenage gibberish translator though. I don't think that's his point. While a UFO nutter, he seems pretty genuine in his belief that Apollo was real. (perhaps we can introduce him to Comic, I believe that Apollo was faked and the Astronauts saw UFO's on the moon while they were there, Dave. That'd blow his mind. Anyway I believe that what he is saying is that Apollo was real because if the TV they were broadcasts was blocked and then substituted for faked footage, the astronauts wouldn't have stayed quiet about it, but would have complained publicly. At least that is what I think he means. |
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Jan 20, 2008 17:34:51 GMT -4
Anyway I believe that what he is saying is that Apollo was real because if the TV they were broadcasts was blocked and then substituted for faked footage, the astronauts wouldn't have stayed quiet about it, but would have complained publicly. At least that is what I think he means. That's certainly as reasonable as my interpretation if not more so. |
|
