"Pilots for Truth": more "pilots" than "truth"

[papageno]

An Italian blog dedicated to debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories caught the attention of a major member of the "Pilots for Truth" group.

Here is the post.

There is one excerpt in the comments I wanted to share with you:

acaguy2001
Why are you asking these questions of Pier when you can email the source? Pier is a member of our team.. yes.. but he is not a pilot. Why not email the founders? I think i know why. I think others here know why as well.

My response to this point was:

papageno
Does this mean that Pier Paolo Murru is second-class member of your group and does not have access to all the information in its possession?

The name of the group is "Pilots for Truth", but I thought the emphasis would be on "truth" and not on "pilots".

[3onthetree]

z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?

Go and get stuck into em.

[papageno]

3onthetree said:

z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?

Go and get stuck into em.

With somebody who said: "We share our results with the people that matter." ?

I don't see the point.

[Obviousman]

PFT is a joke.

[gillianren]

papageno said:

With somebody who said: "We share our results with the people that matter." ?

I don't see the point.

Well, first off (I'm assuming you're quoting directly), it should be people who matter.

However. More to the point.

If you're trying to make people angry about something and get something done about it, everyone matters. You should spread information as far as you can. If you don't, you're not doing all you can, or even the simplest part.

[jaydeehess]

To gillianren's point I tried suggesting to Rob Balsamo a few other ways to get his message out to the public and therefore to put pressure upon the NTSB to fully address all the questions he has for them about Flt 77.
I suggested writing an article and submitting it to "Aviation Week and Space Technology", "Scientific American", "Discover" and any other similar publications. Not only did he refuse to consider such a thing but he also abused me in his response posts. He had been asked in the thread , by his computer guy, if it would be OK to release more info and he said "no". When I questioned the logic of this I was banned.

JDX/Rob Balsamo is one of the worst bandictators there are. Anyone wishing to post comments contrary to the dogma of P4T is relegated to one subforum, the inronically named "Debate" section. Posts contrary to forum dogma made in other sections get moved to "Debate". Only registered members can view the "Debate" subforum. Posters who do not tow the party line inevitably always get banned.

It seems more and more likely that Balsamo is at least just as interested in sales of his video as he is about forwarding any "truth" to the masses.

If hasn't been here yet, I would lay a small bet that he will be, eventually.

[papageno]

jaydeehess said:

It seems more and more likely that Balsamo is at least just as interested in sales of his video as he is about forwarding any "truth" to the masses.

You should see how he bragged about the increased number of hits his webpage was getting, and about the increased DVD sales to Italy.