There are hundreds of reasons on which we faked the moon landings...
Please list them.
JFK promised to land a man on the moon and return him safely before the end of the 60's, funny how it happened in the year 1969.
Distraction from the Vietnam war.
Space race against the Soviet Union.
To make history.
To encourage new technology.
To encourage new ideas for further future missions.
To intimidate the Soviet Union.
To increase aviation technology.
To encourage more scientists.
To encourage more scientists in Astronomy.
America was losing the space race involving the following,
First man/woman in space.
First animal in space.
First three person mission in space.
First space station in orbit.
If we sent 6 manned spacecraft to the moon in ten years, then why in 30 years with so many technological advances haven’t we been back once? NASA says that there was a budget cut and this can be explained for the first 10 years after the Apollo missions, because of the build up of nuclear weapons (due to the cold war) would have cost money that could have been taken away from NASA.
Let me continue with the list.
To encourage better film and camera technology.
To create a sense of actual achievement.
To Intimidate the world, if US could get to the moon they could bomb any part of the planet.
To increase scientific development in telescopes and satellites.
Russia firing Yuri Gagarin into space.
By contrast, the still photos were stunning. Yet that's just the problem. The astronauts took thousands of pictures, each one perfectly exposed and sharply focused. Not one was badly composed or even blurred. This inspired more photography experts and photographic technology.
To create and buy time for radiation technology to be developed.
Cancer research in relation to radiation so they could actually get a man to the moon.
To further understand the psychology of manipulation and proper gander.
Several years after NASA claimed its first Moon landing, Buzz Aldrin "the second man on the Moon" was asked at a banquet what it felt like to step on to the lunar surface. Aldrin staggered to his feet and left the room crying uncontrollably. It would not be the last time he did this. "It strikes me he's suffering from trying to live out a very big lie," Aldrin may also fear for his life.
Scientists couldn't believe NASA's carelessness - even a chemistry students in high school know high pressure oxygen is extremely explosive. In fact, before the first manned Apollo fight even cleared the launch pad, a total of 11 would be astronauts were dead. Apart from the three who were incinerated, seven died in plane crashes and one in a car smash. Now this is
a spectacular accident rate.
Yeah we really landed on the moon. Ha! The only real thing about the whole moon landings were the take off and the dead astronauts when a accident occurred.
NASA is planning another giant step - Project Outreach, a 1 trillion dollar manned mission to Mars. Think what they'll be able to mock up with today's computer graphics, special effects was in its infancy in the 60s. This time round will have no way of determining the truth.
Here are a few things to tease you brain with before I continue to list more reasons why the moon landing was faked.
Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air. Funny how today we know such things but in 1969 they never actually thought of that.
A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?
One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?
The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were seen freely bending their joints.
The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would have been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium flares.
Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?
The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?
How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars? Not one single photo shows any stars at all, haha that's a dead give away, only a child would believe these photo's are real.
The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired. That's pretty funny, haha 1969 damn you people were stupid.
During the videos of the lunar landings the astronauts replied instantly to Mission Control in Houston, Yet light, radio waves, and all energies of the electromagnetic spectrum travel at roughly 186,000 miles per second, meaning the response time of the astronauts to comments made by Mission Control should have been a little over two seconds since the moon is over 200,000 miles from the Earth.
The US space agency (Nasa) has cancelled the book intended to challenge the conspiracy theorists who claim the Moon landings were a hoax.
Nasa declined to comment specifically on the reasons for dropping the publication, but it is understood the decision resulted from the bad publicity that followed the announcement of the project. I wonder why, hahahaha!
NASA have never offered any explanation whatsoever for the numerous errors in the photographs, despite repeated questioning.
These errors include:
The Apollo 11 pictures show the ground in the distance being much darker than the ground in the foreground, as if the Astronauts were standing in a pool of light.
Several photos show evidence of extra lighting (as a professional photographer would use fill-in lights) but no such lights were supposed to have been used.
Some photos clearly show the light coming from "impossible" angles. In one instance, Aldrin's boot is lit from below as he descends the ladder.
Some photos contradict the TV camera pictures of the same events.
Some photos of one astronaut taken by the other are clearly taken from slightly above the eye level of the subject, but in his visor, the reflection of the astronaut with the camera shows it being held at chest level.
The length of the shadows in the Apollo 12 pictures don't agree with the angle which the Sun should have been at.
Some wide area photos show shadows pointing in different directions.
In the sound recording of the lunar landing, you cannot hear the sound of the engines. As the astronaut calls out the remaining distance to the surface, he is only a few feet away from a rocket engine which should have
been producing 10000 lb of thrust.
The sounds
The major point which has helped convince me that the moon landing was faked was the fact that when the control room asked a question to the Astronauts the replies were instant with no delays. This seems strange as even with technology in the 1990's there is a delay from satellite links from the UK to the US. There is about a 0.7 second delay from London to California so how is it possible for instant replies from the Moon ?
There is also evidence that when people go into space that there voice goes tense although the Astronauts voices have been analyzed and found to be normal, and 7/10 people said it sounded like someone reading from a script.
When Houston are talking to the module you should not be able to hear the responses at least when the module is landing and the infamous "eagle has landed" quote, this is due to the noise that should have been created by the rocket motor which generates several hundred thousand pounds of thrust 20 ft below the astronauts. The noise would have completely drowned
the vocals out.
Anyone with even elemental math skills and common sense can look at the facts, do the calculations, and come to their own conclusions about the alleged MASSIVE VOLUME of lunar surface photography in such a LIMITED TIME.
Back to the reasons on why they would fake such a thing. hahaha!
In1969
Computer chips were as powerful then as a modern washing machines chip so they resorted to faking the landing to ensure a victory of the Soviet Union and keep the dollars coming in for real space projects.
To be the first Country to put a man on the moon.
To test media portrayal techniques.
To purposefully create a conspiracy so the attention was taken away from WAR.
To increase rocket technology.
To encourage weapon technology.
To encourage weaponary scientists.
To encourage more engineers.
To encourage more companies to support NASA.
To RAISE money for the cold war.
To attempt to bring fear into the general population. "Oh they can get to the moon, they must be able to do anything"
I'm getting rather bored of having to explain the obvious to totally ignorant people. Stop smoking the crack pipe people, and no that comment was not directed to any one person in particular.
We never landed on the moon get over it.