|
Post by Grand Lunar on Mar 30, 2009 8:25:28 GMT -4
In a discussion on YouTube, I pointed out to an HB that a couple of Gemini missions skirted the lower regions the Van Allen Belts. I pointed out Gemini 11's orbital parameters to the figures for the extend of the inner belt. The highest orbit for Gemini 11, around 1300 km, seems to take it into the inner belt, which I've read starts around 700 km.
The HB counters that from what he read, Gemini 11 specifically avoided the belts to get data from GCRs (galatic cosmic rays). I tried to search the net to varify his claim, but found no specific info on Gemini 11's studies. Anyone know better?
Also, are there interactions that other Gemini missions might have had with the VABs?
Also, I found other figures for the inner belt's extent, stating that it starts around 7,600 km. Is it really this figure, or the 700 km one?
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Mar 30, 2009 9:08:04 GMT -4
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Mar 30, 2009 11:52:27 GMT -4
I'm not familiar with the HB's claim, though I can't deny it. I'll look through whatever references I have at home to see if there is any mention of it. None-the-less, Gemini 11 couldn't completely avoid the VAB. The best that could be done is to set the apogee to occur when the spacecraft is at its furthest from the equator. Even doing this, the spacecraft would still be crossing the equator at an altitude near 800 km.
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Mar 30, 2009 15:28:58 GMT -4
Also, are there interactions that other Gemini missions might have had with the VABs? Gemini 10 entered the VABs too.
|
|
|
Post by gwiz on Mar 31, 2009 10:43:33 GMT -4
Gemini 10 actually encountered much higher radiation levels than Gemini 11. Although Gemini 10 didn't reach the same high altitudes, it stayed much longer in its high orbit and passed through the South Atlantic Anomaly during that time.
I'm afraid that your HB is essentially correct about Gemini 11. It's brief high-altitude excursion was indeed carefully tailored to keep the dose down for the cosmic ray experiment.
|
|
|
Post by Data Cable on Mar 31, 2009 20:33:32 GMT -4
HB is essentially correct This is one of the signs of the apocalypse, ain't it?
|
|
|
Post by grashtel on Mar 31, 2009 23:22:45 GMT -4
HB is essentially correct This is one of the signs of the apocalypse, ain't it? Only if they start doing it consistently, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
|
|
|
Post by Grand Lunar on Apr 4, 2009 22:17:35 GMT -4
Many thanks for the info, people!
Or in the cases of most HBs, people that have stopped learning, right?
|
|
|
Post by dragonblaster on Apr 11, 2009 18:09:39 GMT -4
I'm amazed the HB didn't just counter by saying the Gemini shots were fake as well. Which of course begs the question of why then Dick Gordon had such a problematic EVA, like Mike Collins before him and Gene Cernan before him... and that the EVA problems were ironed out by the arch-hoaxter himself, Buzz Aldrin.
|
|