|
|
Post by lazarusty on Jun 10, 2010 21:30:24 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Jun 10, 2010 22:18:26 GMT -4
And? Any comments of your own?
edit to add: every single one of those videos can and has been explained on this forum and many others. You haven't taken the time to look have you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Jun 10, 2010 22:22:52 GMT -4
And? Any comments of your own? edit to add: every single one of those videos can and has been explained on this forum and many others. You haven't taken the time to look have you? Exactly. Rusty, what is your opinion of the videos? Can you give a quick summary of each video with your comments? |
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Jun 10, 2010 23:27:09 GMT -4
Remembering that there are people who don't or can't watch YouTube videos, of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Jun 11, 2010 4:12:46 GMT -4
Only seven?
Not enough space here for the evidence that says it happened.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazarusty on Jun 11, 2010 4:34:47 GMT -4
I saw the page while at an educational facility, and thought of you all. I couldn't view them there. Just an impulse really to post the link.
No doubt they have all been "explained" (as you put it) all over the forum but here they are now all in one place.
|
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Jun 11, 2010 6:44:20 GMT -4
"explained"? Links you mention proven as useful as a chocolate tea pot for the hoax brigade you mean. As they will not play for me but the text is explanatory I think I can safely say they are bunkum?
|
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Jun 11, 2010 9:26:01 GMT -4
Wow, the first video is the one that was edited by a YouTube user to show how gullible hoaxers are when it comes to video. He put in a "stage hand" placing some stuff - after most hoaxers had a field day with it, the guy posted another video showing how he had composited green screen footage of his own into a film that first showed absolutely nothing.
The other videos are mainly stuff from the old documentary with Percy in it (you know, the one with the authoritative British voice over), or some Bart Sibrel BS.
|
|
|
|
Post by Obviousman on Jun 11, 2010 10:34:37 GMT -4
Oh hum.
Please give me some specific points I can address.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Jun 11, 2010 11:45:25 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Jun 11, 2010 13:17:26 GMT -4
Gosh, HBs being deceptive? That never happens!
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Jun 11, 2010 17:21:31 GMT -4
"Top seven moon hoax videos" in what way? Top seven most ignorant? Top seven most laughable? Help me out here.
|
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Jun 12, 2010 10:04:08 GMT -4
"Top seven moon hoax videos" in what way? Top seven most ignorant? Top seven most laughable? Help me out here. The top seven most debunked would be a very fitting description as 6 out of 7 have been discussed for years going back to a pre-YouTube era. The other one wasn't genuine Apollo footage to begin with. |
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Jun 12, 2010 14:25:01 GMT -4
I find it interesting that the author of the blog, Luke, defends his post by stating that it isn't an "article", but a "blog", so somehow it doesn't need to have any journalistic integrity.
And its amazing that it is in the technology section and not entertainment.
|
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Jun 12, 2010 15:25:07 GMT -4
At least some of the commenters posted factual information about why the hoax theories are wrong. That's good to see.
|
|
