|
|
Post by rodin on Aug 9, 2010 11:14:20 GMT -4
OK peeps. I have a couple posters on another forum who also post here and they are making claims that are simply wrong just to explain away some awkward evidence. I have been 'dared' to come here with my analyses. As you can see I have accepted the dare.
First a little test of the laws of physics.
1) In free flight in the Moon's gravity field what form would a plot of height against time take?
2) If I jump up on the Moon and reach maximum height after 5 seconds how much longer before I land?
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Aug 9, 2010 11:34:02 GMT -4
1) In free flight in the Moon's gravity field what form would a plot of height against time take? Parabolic 2) If I jump up on the Moon and reach maximum height after 5 seconds how much longer before I land? 5 seconds Now I have a question for you. What's a peep? |
|
|
|
Post by rodin on Aug 9, 2010 11:40:30 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by rodin on Aug 9, 2010 11:46:04 GMT -4
Another thing - if it were ever proven forensically beyond a shadow of doubt that official 'Live' Apollo footage was actually faked, would the establishment have to concede the entire mission was faked or could they just say 'oh well we faked some films to make a better show but we really went there honest' and get away with it?
|
|
|
|
Post by hplasm on Aug 9, 2010 12:03:06 GMT -4
Title says "- proves hoax by rodin" If your analysis (sic) can't prove a hoax perpetrated by yourself, what chance do you have of proving anything else?  |
|
|
|
Post by rodin on Aug 9, 2010 12:04:43 GMT -4
Title says "- proves hoax by rodin" If your analysis (sic) can't prove a hoax perpetrated by yourself, what chance do you have of proving anything else? lol I walked into that didn't I |
|
|
|
Post by rodin on Aug 9, 2010 12:07:58 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by hplasm on Aug 9, 2010 12:12:04 GMT -4
Title says "- proves hoax by rodin" If your analysis (sic) can't prove a hoax perpetrated by yourself, what chance do you have of proving anything else? lol I walked into that didn't I Sorry- long time no post. Couldn't resist  Please continue. |
|
|
|
Post by dwight on Aug 9, 2010 12:15:48 GMT -4
I doubt very much you are going to be able to prove the live transmission was faked. There are a lot of people here armed with alot of evidence Tv related which weighs very, very strongly on the side of the TX being "as advertised".
|
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Aug 9, 2010 12:25:50 GMT -4
Another thing - if it were ever proven forensically beyond a shadow of doubt that official 'Live' Apollo footage was actually faked, would the establishment have to concede the entire mission was faked or could they just say 'oh well we faked some films to make a better show but we really went there honest' and get away with it? Don't count your chickens before they hatch. The burden of proof is on you. Speculation about what some third party would do under some circumstance is a distraction to evade that burden. |
|
|
|
Post by rodin on Aug 9, 2010 12:30:28 GMT -4
Another thing - if it were ever proven forensically beyond a shadow of doubt that official 'Live' Apollo footage was actually faked, would the establishment have to concede the entire mission was faked or could they just say 'oh well we faked some films to make a better show but we really went there honest' and get away with it? Can I have an answer to this question please? Then I will continue |
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Aug 9, 2010 12:35:53 GMT -4
As a layman, I see these issues. The parabola would only apply to the center of mass. Appendages would not necessarily travel in a parabola. Time up vs down for an astronaut would depend on changes in surface conditions and position of the legs at the jump and landing or perhaps other things. Further difficulties come in measuring the time of travel from the video. Are you making a claim about the tv transmission? Care to address these issues in you analysis? |
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Aug 9, 2010 12:38:03 GMT -4
Another thing - if it were ever proven forensically beyond a shadow of doubt that official 'Live' Apollo footage was actually faked, would the establishment have to concede the entire mission was faked or could they just say 'oh well we faked some films to make a better show but we really went there honest' and get away with it? Can I have an answer to this question please? Then I will continue No one can answer a question about what an organization might do in the future under some counter factual circumstances. All replies would just be speculation. |
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Aug 9, 2010 12:50:47 GMT -4
Now I have a question for you. What's a peep? They're very popular at Easter.  |
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Aug 9, 2010 12:54:39 GMT -4
Another thing - if it were ever proven forensically beyond a shadow of doubt that official 'Live' Apollo footage was actually faked, would the establishment have to concede the entire mission was faked or could they just say 'oh well we faked some films to make a better show but we really went there honest' and get away with it? Can I have an answer to this question please? Then I will continue How about you stick to questions that we can answer without resorting to speculation. We can't realistically be expected to tell you what someone else might do in a purely hypothetical situation. So I suggest you get to the point. Start by proving to us that the live TV broadcasts from the moon were faked. |
|
